Fact Sheet: HEU Minimization Activities since March 2014

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                         

FACT SHEET

Highly Enriched Uranium Minimization Activities since March 2014

Minimization of highly enriched uranium (HEU) in civilian applications is a priority for the Nuclear Security Summit process.  Eliminating all HEU from facilities or countries decreases the number of potential targets for terrorists, criminals, and other unauthorized actors to obtain this material.  Minimization efforts include HEU reactor conversions and shut-downs, nuclear material removals, technology substitution, and down-blending.  Each of these activities represents permanent threat reduction by preventing sensitive nuclear materials from falling into the wrong hands.

Through the Nuclear Security Summit process, the international community has made considerable progress in this area.  Since the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, the United States has supported the conversion of HEU reactors in Russia, Jamaica, China, and Kazakhstan.  The United States also confirmed the shutdown of four HEU reactors: two in Russia, one in Uzbekistan, and one in Switzerland.

Once facilities are converted and HEU is no longer required, the material can be removed.  Since March 2014, the United States removed or confirmed disposition of approximately 450 kilograms of HEU from 10 countries (Poland, Kazakhstan, Canada, Switzerland, Jamaica, Uzbekistan, Austria, Germany, Japan, and Argentina).  As a result of these efforts, three additional countries are now considered free of HEU (Switzerland, Uzbekistan, and Argentina), defined as having less than one kilogram of HEU on their territory.  In total, 29 countries plus Taiwan are now HEU-free after eliminating their HEU.

Fact Sheet: Joint Statement on Certified Training

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                         

FACT SHEET

Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management

The challenges associated with managing nuclear and other radiological materials are varied and complex, and it is essential that states to their utmost to maintain security over such materials.  Effective security relies upon the competence of management and personnel who are responsible for this work.  Therefore, it is crucial that managers and personnel responsible for nuclear security continuously maintain and improve their skills.  Much progress has been made in this area since the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, particularly with the development of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Information Circular 869 and with the establishment of the World Institute of Nuclear Security (WINS) Academy Nuclear Security Management Certification Program.

The WINS Academy is a comprehensive training program for nuclear security professionals, with modules that cover a wide variety of disciplines.  Upon successful completion, students become Certified Nuclear Security Professionals.  Certification is valid for three years, after which time recertification is required.  The program is designed to develop a network of certified professional who are affecting meaningful and sustainable changes to nuclear security worldwide.

In support of this issue, Canada has sponsored the Gift Basket on Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management.  As a signatory to this Gift Basket, the United States commits to further support the WINS Academy, including through the provision of advocacy, peer review support, contributions, or by other means as necessary, and to promote cooperative efforts between the WINS Academy and the IAEA.  The United States has supported WINS through federal grants and works with the both IAEA and directly with partner countries to provide a wide variety of training to personnel responsible for securing nuclear and radiological materials.

Fact Sheet: Joint Statement on Promoting Full and Universal Implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004)

THE WHITE HOUSE 

Office of the Press Secretary

______________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                        

FACT SHEET

UN Security Council Resolution 1540

UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540, adopted unanimously in 2004 under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, establishes legally binding obligations on all States to develop and enforce appropriate and effective measures against the proliferation of nuclear weapons or material, their means of delivery and related materials.  The resolution also created a UN Security Council subsidiary body, the 1540 Committee, to monitor and foster implementation of the resolution.

The Joint Statement on Promoting Full and Universal Implementation of UNSCR 1540, sponsored by Canada, Republic of Korea and Spain, recognizes the resolution and the 1540 Committee as key players in the international legal and institutional infrastructure for strengthening global nuclear security and combating nuclear terrorism.  In addition, the Joint Statement identifies ways to support the long-term efforts required to implement the resolution and the work of the 1540 Committee.  The Joint Statement further emphasizes the importance of the Second Comprehensive Review of the resolution by the 1540 Committee, now underway, in helping States achieve full implementation of the resolution by 2021, including the implementation of obligations to enhance the security of nuclear materials worldwide.

As part of its commitment to the Joint Statement, the United States pledges to continued support of the resolution and the 1540 Committee, robust participation in the Second Comprehensive Review of the resolution, and the submission of regular reporting on domestic implementation of the resolution. To further meet its obligations and commitments, the United States maintains a wide range of assistance programs and outreach efforts to help others implement their UNSCR 1540 obligations.

UNSCR 1540 and the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism constitute key parts of the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit’s Action Plan in support of the UN, in which the United States and other Summit participating States commit to further stregthen the global nuclear security architecture by working to enhance the capacity of States to implement their UNSCR 1540 obligations.  As part of this Action Plan, the United States and other Summit participants pledge to increase our efforts to enhance national implementation, coordination and cooperation, assistance, and outreach under the umbrella of UNSCR 1540.  Furthermore, the United States reaffirms its commitment to full implementation of the resolution as part of the Summit’s Joint Statement on Promoting Full and Universal Implementation of UNSCR 1540. 

###

Fact Sheet: Update on Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation (INFCIRC 869)

THE WHITE HOUSE 

Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                        

FACT SHEET

Update on INFCIRC 869

On October 9, 2014, the Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, on behalf of its Government and 34 other countries (full list below), conveyed to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Secretariat the “Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation” from the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit and requested that it be circulated to all IAEA Member States.  The subscribing states pledged to take specific steps, including implementing key IAEA nuclear security guidance, accepting voluntary peer reviews, and committing that those responsible for nuclear security are demonstrably competent.  The Dutch note verbale  encouraged all States to meet the intent of these essential elements of a nuclear security regime and to commit to the effective and sustainable implementation of the principles therein.  The IAEA has circulated the 2014 Joint Statement as INFCIRC/869, to which all IAEA Member States could ascribe.

On November 13, 2015, Jordan pledged its commitment to the Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation, as contained in INFCIRC/869.  Jordan is the 36th IAEA member state to subscribe to the statement, and the first to do so outside the Summit process.

The United States continues to encourage all IAEA member states to indicate their commitment to implement the provisions of INFCIRC/869, noting that such public commitments provide public assurances that nuclear materials are effectively secured and underscore support for the IAEA and its nuclear security efforts.

Full List of Subscribers

Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and Vietnam.

###

Fact Sheet: Joint Statement on Certified Training

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                       

FACT SHEET

Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management

The challenges associated with managing nuclear and other radiological materials are varied and complex, and it is essential that states to their utmost to maintain security over such materials.  Effective security relies upon the competence of management and personnel who are responsible for this work.  Therefore, it is crucial that managers and personnel responsible for nuclear security continuously maintain and improve their skills.  Much progress has been made in this area since the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, particularly with the development of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Information Circular 869 and with the establishment of the World Institute of Nuclear Security (WINS) Academy Nuclear Security Management Certification Program.

The WINS Academy is a comprehensive training program for nuclear security professionals, with modules that cover a wide variety of disciplines.  Upon successful completion, students become Certified Nuclear Security Professionals.  Certification is valid for three years, after which time recertification is required.  The program is designed to develop a network of certified professional who are affecting meaningful and sustainable changes to nuclear security worldwide.

In support of this issue, Canada has sponsored the Gift Basket on Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management.  As a signatory to this Gift Basket, the United States commits to further support the WINS Academy, including through the provision of advocacy, peer review support, contributions, or by other means as necessary, and to promote cooperative efforts between the WINS Academy and the IAEA.  The United States has supported WINS through federal grants and works with the both IAEA and directly with partner countries to provide a wide variety of training to personnel responsible for securing nuclear and radiological materials.

###

Joint Statement on Certified Training

Joint Statement on

Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management

2016 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington D.C.

Introduction

Gathered in Washington D.C. on the occasion of the fourth Nuclear Security Summit, the leaders of Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States welcome the progress that has been made by states to commit to the effective and sustainable implementation of the essential elements of nuclear security guidance, particularly in the area of ensuring that management and personnel with accountability for nuclear security are demonstrably competent.   

At the 2014 Hague Nuclear Security Summit, thirty five states sponsored a Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation.  The aim of this Joint Statement was for Subscribing States, at their own discretion, to meet the intent of the essential elements of a nuclear security regime and to commit to the effective and sustainable implementation of the principles therein. The Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation was subsequently published by the IAEA in 2014 as INFCIRC/869 and is open for any IAEA Member State to support.

One of the four key commitments outlined in the Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation is for Subscribing States to “Ensure that management and personnel with accountability for nuclear security are demonstrably competent.” The challenges associated with managing nuclear and other radiological materials are complex, and it is essential that States ensure that such materials remain secure. The Joint Statement outlines two ways in which States can support the training of effective and competent managers of those materials and related facilities:

  • Maintaining and continuously improving domestic or regional training through education, certification and/or qualification activities; and
  • Supporting or participating in the development of World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) best practice guides and training activities.

In support of the commitments in the Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States, together with a number of corporations and foundations, joined together to establish the WINS Academy, the world’s first structured professional development and certification program for nuclear security managers. The first training module of the WINS Academy was launched at the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit.

Since its launch at the 2014 Summit, and with support from Nuclear Security Summit participating States, corporations and foundations, the WINS Academy has developed a robust international nuclear security certification program.  The training program is designed to develop a network of certified professionals who are implementing meaningful and sustainable changes to security culture and best practices worldwide. To date, 560 participants from 75 countries have registered in the WINS Academy certification program.   

Next Steps

In support of the commitments in INFCIRC/869, and acknowledging the international recognition of the need for nuclear security training, education, certification and/or qualification activities, this gift basket records the intent of Canada, Finland, Hungary, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States to undertake to further support the WINS Academy in its efforts to expand its international certification program, including through the provision of advocacy, peer review support, contributions, or by other means as necessary.  

The States listed above also recognize and undertake to promote cooperative efforts between the WINS Academy and the IAEA, including: WINS cooperation with the IAEA Nuclear Security Support Centre (NSSC) Working Group on Best Practices, whose 2014-2015 Action Plan includes the development of a program to collect lessons learned case studies from NSSC members; and WINS Academy cooperation with the IAEA’s International Nuclear Security Education Network (INSEN), which has helped academics connect and collaborate with WINS to help develop blended courses leading to joint certification.

We welcome other States, supported by industry and civil society, to provide a tangible commitment in support of the WINS Academy and certified professional development for nuclear security. Together we can help to ensure that nuclear and other radioactive materials remain secure under the management of demonstrably competent professionals.

Joint Statement on Countering Nuclear Smuggling

2016 Statement of Activity and Cooperation to Counter Nuclear Smuggling

At the 2010, 2012, and 2014 Nuclear Security Summits, participating nations agreed on Communiqués and Work Plans that included actions aimed at thwarting the illicit trafficking of nuclear or other radioactive materials. The following countries recognize that identifying nuclear smugglers, detecting and recovering nuclear and other radioactive material out of regulatory control, and prosecuting those responsible are important and effective activities to help prevent terrorists from acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials: Australia, Canada, Chile, China,  the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland,  France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan,  The Republic of Korea, Lithuania, Malaysia, Morocco, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, The Philippines, Poland, Romania, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, The United Arab Emirates, The United Kingdom, The United States of America, INTERPOL, and the United Nations.

To follow through on these pledges, participating states are committed to working together to build and sustain national capabilities to counter the smuggling of nuclear and other radioactive materials. These efforts may include:

1.     Designating a national team or task force to link law enforcement, intelligence, technical experts, and other relevant authorities to investigate nuclear trafficking networks and incidents;

2.     Developing plans that clearly outline individual agency roles and responsibilities when responding to incidents of material outside regulatory control;

3.     Developing a national level detection architecture as an element of a whole-of-government counter nuclear smuggling capability;

4.     Strengthening nuclear forensics capabilities to reliably analyze nuclear and other radioactive material discovered out of regulatory control;

5.     Increasing legal training for prosecutors to ensure conviction of smugglers, as appropriate;

6.     Developing laws, regulations, guidance and/or policies to combat illicit trafficking of nuclear and other radioactive material;

7.     Strengthening bilateral, multilateral, and international information sharing and other cooperation, such as training and education, best practices exchanges, and exercises;

8.     Sharing applicable lead information through INTERPOL and acting on lead information received as an effective mechanism for identifying nuclear smuggling networks in a timely manner and to enhance cooperation;

9.     Sharing information on incidents involving nuclear and radioactive material out of regulatory control through the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Incident and Trafficking Database.

 

Joint Statement on Cyber Security

2016: Gift Basket on cyber security of industrial control and plant systems at nuclear facilities 

Subscribed by: Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and the United Nations.

Introduction

The States listed above commit to ensure adequate cyber security at industrial control and plant systems at nuclear facilities.  These control systems are often used within safeguards, security, and safety systems.  Increased attention in this area will assist States, nuclear operators and the supply chain to continue to strengthen the resilience of these systems, protecting them from potential malicious attack or accidental damage.

To date, work has mainly focused on mitigating the vulnerabilities of enterprise systems used to manage information and data within nuclear facilities and supply chains.  This work needs to extend to industrial control systems.

Nuclear facilities benefit from robust safety mechanisms which have been strengthened and developed over several decades.  In addition to physical, logical, and human based controls, there has been an increase in the use of information technology to form part of the safety and security aspects of plant control systems, as well as nuclear material accountancy and control.  More information on the use of information technology and the associated threats and vulnerabilities in this context is needed to inform continuous security improvements.

The Initiative

The States listed above agree, as resources permit, to participate in two international workshops on this topic in 2016.  These workshops will enable States and their nuclear sectors to share good practice in managing risks to industrial control systems in nuclear sites, as well as examine the impact of using information technology in managing safety and security aspects of plant control systems.

These workshops will focus on areas including:

  • Threats and vulnerabilities, through considering case studies of recent incidents;
  • Potential or known incidents which can impact on control systems, through an interactive approach;
  • Technical and management challenges of managing risksto legacy systems;
  • Technical and management challenges of assuring new build nuclear and supply chains
  • Incident response and recovery.
  • Managing public/media expectation in light of an incident.

Outcomes and Next Steps

The States listed above propose to present the findings of this work at the Ministerial segment of the IAEA International Conference on Nuclear Security, in Vienna in December 2016 to contribute to IAEA efforts to increase cyber security at nuclear facilities, building on the IAEA International Conference on Computer Security in a Nuclear World held in June 2015. 

Joint Statement on Forensics in Nuclear Security

JOINT STATEMENT in the context of the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit

Forensics in Nuclear Security                                                                     

Applying science to investigate the illicit use of nuclear or other radioactive material is a crucial element of nuclear security.  Nuclear forensic science assists in determining the provenance of materials encountered out of regulatory control by focusing on the questions that would be asked by regulatory authorities or law enforcement investigators.

This gift basket records the intent of 30 countries[1] to advance nuclear forensics as a key element of effective nuclear security. This may be accomplished by incorporating nuclear forensics as an important element of a nation’s coordinated response, cultivating and sustaining expertise in the fundamental scientific disciplines; and advocating for and supporting international efforts where the implementation of both traditional and nuclear forensic capabilities may be enhanced through sharing.

The Forensics in Nuclear Security Gift Basket presented at the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit raised awareness about good practices employed by practitioners, developed education and training curricula, and advanced international collaboration through a common lexicon and knowledge platform.  Continued effort is needed to strengthen and sustain national nuclear forensic capabilities through their inclusion in national response plans and communicating what nuclear forensics can provide to stakeholders.

Recognizing that practical implementation and sustainment of nuclear forensic capabilities are an enduring component of nuclear security, States that subscribe to this Joint Statement commit to one or more of the following elements: 

  • Develop and sustain expertise through actions such as cross-disciplinary training of traditional forensic and nuclear scientists, transferring knowledge to the next generation of practitioners, cultivating attractive career paths, and facilitating participation in international training including, but not limited to, those offered by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Nuclear Forensics International Technical Working Group (ITWG), the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), or the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT). 
  • Promote employment of existing national nuclear science capabilities to support nuclear forensics.
  • Evaluate and adapt existing national response frameworks to incorporate the effective use of nuclear forensic capabilities.
  • Advance and mature nuclear forensic expertise in other countries through efforts such as providing instruction at or hosting international courses or conferences, publishing techniques in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, or serving as leaders in relevant international groups.

[1] The following countries are signatories to this Joint Statement: Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, France, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Philippines, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, ROK, Thailand, UK and USA. The following organization also supports this Joint Statement: INTERPOL]

Joint Statement on Maritime Supply Chain Security

2016 Nuclear Security Summit

Maritime Supply Chain Security Joint Statement 

Over the past decade, many countries have deployed radiation detection systems at their seaports as a key component of their national approach to combating nuclear and radiological smuggling.  These systems have detected numerous nuclear and other radioactive materials out of regulatory control (MORC) - some that pose security risks and others that just pose risks to public health and safety, or are of regulatory concern(e.g. contaminated goods and orphan sources).  Due to the complexity of the maritime system and the many stakeholders involved, it is clear that national, regional and international coordination in both the public and private sector is needed to secure this vector and enable the permanent removal of these materials from the maritime supply chain. 

With this in mind, 15 countries, nine international organizations, three terminal operators, and several academic representatives participated in a workshop from 16-18 November 2015, co-sponsored by the United States and the United Kingdom, focused on promoting radiation detection in the maritime supply chain and developing enhanced measures to permanently remove materials found out of regulatory control.  This workshop was in fulfillment of a commitment made at the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit in a joint statement on maritime supply chain security.  Workshop participants acknowledged that detection systems are an important tool in a nation’s approach to locating and securing MORC and identified a set of best practices and recommendations. 

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Georgia, Israel, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States endorse the following best practices and recommendations identified at the November 2015 workshop.

Best Practices

Nations with detection programs have agreed to continue to share technical advice, lessons learned and best practices with one another and with those nations seeking to implement and sustain detection systems.  Specific examples of best practices include:

  1. Plan for long-term sustainability of systems early in the process of developing and deploying radiation detection programs; 
  2. Establish a comprehensive "end-to-end" regulatory framework that provides the necessary framework and authorities to all stakeholders involved in the detection, notification and response to materials found out of regulatory control;
  3. Implement and institutionalize regular training and adaptive exercises that address evolving threats, operational challenges and security strategies of detection systems to verify that roles and responsibilities are clearly understood and that all relevant stakeholders maintain a state of readiness;
  4. Take appropriate national-level measures at the material’s origin, in accordance with the IAEA Code of Conduct on Radioactive Sources, to ensure that radiological materials are controlled at the point of origin and prevented from entering the maritime supply chain.
  5. Take appropriate measures to ensure that detected nuclear other radioactive materials are placed back under control in either the country responsible for the detection eventor the country of material origin, as appropriate; and
  6. Report incidents involving MORC to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Incident and Trafficking Database (ITDB) in a timely manner and seek other formal and informal mechanisms to share information on detections, trends, and challenges in addressing MORC with regional and international partners.

Recommendations:

  1. Seek opportunities and mechanisms to enhance communication between public and private stakeholders regarding the responsibilities and obligations associated with the removal of MORC from the maritime supply chain and to ensure feedback mechanisms for all parties in the ultimate resolution of MORC cases, as appropriate;Develop technical and operational solutions to reduce alarms from innocent, naturally occurring radioactive material (“NORM”) to protect commerce and to focus resources on detecting materials of concern;
  2. Request that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) continue to study technical and operational issues related to detection operations through cooperative research projects and other mechanisms as appropriate;
  3. Request that INTERPOL continue and enhance current efforts to ensure that threat information flows from law enforcement to front line officers (i.e. Customs and Border Protection) involved in detection operations;
  4. Request that the World Customs Organization (WCO) expand its efforts to deploy a common communication platform between customs organisations, which could be leveraged to facilitate timely information sharing in member states on detections, trends and challenges in addressing MORC; and
  5. Investigate whether the WCO or other appropriate organisations could expand their efforts to facilitate information sharing that goes beyond customs organisations to regulators or other applicable organisations in order to allow all those organisations involved in the detection and removal of MORC to share timely information, ensure that material is permanently removed from the supply chain and correctly disposed of. 

The United States and the United Kingdom will document and share these and other best practices and recommendations with the international community. 

Joint Statement on National Nuclear Detection Architecture

Nuclear Security Summit 2016

Statement on National Nuclear Detection Architectures

Introduction

This gift basket records the intent of Finland, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Georgia, Hungary, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Republic of Korea, Morocco, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam and INTERPOL to demonstrate their commitment to develop national-level nuclear detection architectures and strengthen regional efforts as an effective capability in combating illicit trafficking and malevolent use of nuclear and other radioactive materials. An integral part of this commitment is international cooperation to promote key architecture elements and principles as well as to address common challenges and mitigation strategies.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a central role in nuclear security worldwide, including in the field of nuclear detection and cooperation.  Other international fora support international cooperation on nuclear detection, most notably, the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT).  Similarly, the Global Partnership against the spread of weapons and materials of mass destruction assists in providing practical assistance on nuclear and radiological security, upon state’s requests, and so supports the work of the IAEA.

IAEA

Through its Nuclear Security Programme, the IAEA supports States in their efforts to establish, maintain and sustain an effective nuclear security detection architecture. The IAEA has adopted a comprehensive approach to nuclear security and has elaborated guidance of major importance[1].  These publications aim at advocating the development and improvement of a nuclear security detection architecture that integrates comprehensive detection capabilities and measures and associated resources to improve a nation’s ability to detect nuclear and radiological threats.  

GICNT

Nuclear detection is a core nuclear security objective for the GICNT. GICNT activities bring critical added value to nuclear detection work through identifying cross-cutting issues, suggesting new solutions and promoting inter-disciplinary and inter-agency cooperation.

Good practices related to nuclear detection are shared, collected and developed under the auspices of the GICNT. They can contribute to producing, assessing and updating IAEA publications.  Frequent scenario-based discussions, table-top exercises and field exercises of the GICNT enhance expertise and skills of members of the global nuclear security community.

Commitments

On the occasion of the 2016 Washington Nuclear Security Summit, we the parties to this Statement reaffirm our commitment to improving further our national detection architectures with the goal to combat illicit trafficking and to prevent malicious acts.

We commit ourselves to efficient use of available nuclear detection resources as well as to avoiding duplication of work between IAEA, GICNT and other relevant bodies.

We further reaffirm our commitment to the IAEA’s recommendations, giving particular attention to the following principles:

  • An effective nuclear security detection architecture should be derived from a comprehensive, integrated detection strategy prepared by the State; 
  • The national nuclear security detection architecture should take into consideration that individual organizations’ roles in the fieldof detection are unambiguously clear;
  • Nuclear security culture is an effective tool that can strengthen the efficiency of the nuclear security detection systems; 
  •  Implementation should account for and integrate border and interior detection capabilities.

We reaffirm, also, our determination to maintain our contributions to the development of the IAEA’s guidance document in the field of detection.

To promote and improve international awareness and understanding of the importance of a national-level nuclear detection architecture, we also advocate and support the work of the IAEA’speriodic review workshops during which participating nations can share good practices and lessons learned and discuss challenges, mitigation strategies, and long-term sustainability approaches.  The IAEA will conduct the first such workshop in Seam Reap, Cambodia in April 2016. 

GICNT Partners joining to this Statement reaffirm their commitment to actively participate and contribute to nuclear detection work that takes place in the Global Initiative. 

[1] As a critical part of this approach, the IAEA published Nuclear Security Series No. 21; Implementing Guide on Nuclear Security Systems and Measures for the Detection of Nuclear and other Radioactive Material out of Regulatory Control

Joint Statement on Nuclear Terrorism Preparedness and Response

Joint Statement on Supporting Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism

Preparedness and Response Capabilities 

Subscribed by Australia, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Morocco, Norway, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, the United Kingdom and the United States, with the support of the United Nations and INTERPOL.

A nuclear terror event anywhere in the world would have devastating human, environmental, economic, and political consequences. Building on the Summit’s nuclear terrorism prevention and nuclear and radiological material security accomplishments and efforts, wethe Parties to this statement recognize the need for ensuring adequate nuclear emergency preparedness and response capabilities.  Such capabilities contribute tofurther reducing not onlythe risks posed by nuclear or radiological terrorism (hereafter, “nuclear terrorism”), but also the risks posed by other malicious activities or accidents involving nuclear or radiological materials and facilities.Ensuring preparedness in National capabilities to counter and respond to nuclear terror acts is a critical task for all Nations, as exemplified by the Scenario-Based Policy Discussions successfully completed by participating nations as part ofthe 2016 Summit.  Nuclear terrorism preparedness requires a range of activities to establish,enhance, sustain, and exercise the capabilities necessary to counter and respond to nuclear terror incidents. Nuclear terrorism response requires a range of technical, operational, and communications capabilities toprovide coordination and resolution of the incident, as well as mitigatingits consequences.

Consistent with the Nuclear Security Summit goal of reducing the threat posed by nuclear terrorism and furthering the 2014 Hague Summit Communique pledge to “maintain effective emergency preparedness, response, and mitigation capabilities,”we the parties to this statementrecognize that ensuring adequate nuclear terrorismpreparedness and response capabilities complements international nuclear security efforts.  We also recognize that adequate nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities contribute to strengthening the interface between nuclear safety and security, and serve as a potential deterrent to attack.

Nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities include the following capabilities:

  • National policies and plans:Establish and maintainadequate National response plans and policies regarding preparedness, response, and mitigation of incidents and threats of nuclear terrorism, including guidance forlocalplanning in responding to such threats and incidents.
  • Technical expertise and capabilities:Identify, confirm, assess, and respond to nuclear terror incidentsand threats, including radiological characterization and assessments to inform protective actions, emergency medical training and response support, and decontamination tools and training.
  • Public communications and education: Develop and maintainstrategic communications and effective public messaging providing not only public safety awareness and emergency readiness in the event of a nuclear terror incident but also mechanisms and procedures for ensuring prompt dissemination of public safety information to potentially affected communities.
  • Sustainment of capabilitiesSustain necessary capabilities through continuing education, training, and exercises involving National and local officials and multinational partners charged with nuclear terrorism preparedness, response, or associated decision-making.
  • International coordination and assistance mechanisms: Per the International Convention on the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, Convention on Assistance in the Case of Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, and other relevant international legal instruments, and considering multilateral mechanisms and initiatives such as offered by the United Nations (UN), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), INTERPOL, the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT), and the Global Partnership (GP) against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction,establish mechanisms for requesting and/or providing (as appropriate):
    • Nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capacity building, 
    • As required, post-event mutualassistance offered by the State Partiesof the Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency,
    • Government-to-Government coordination and communication in the event of nuclear terrorism.

Recognizing that an act of nuclear terrorism anywhere in the world would have global impacts affecting all Nations, wethe parties to this statement affirm ourwillingnessto cooperate to strengthen National and international nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities.  We agree on the following commitments in support of this objective:

  • Ensure adequate National nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities at home.  We the parties to this statement reaffirm our National commitment to establish and maintain the National-level capabilities required for nuclear terrorism preparedness and response.We also commit to conductcomprehensivenuclear terrorism preparedness and response drills, incorporating roles and responsibilities at the National and local levels to foster strong interagency cooperation across law enforcement, medical, technical/scientific, and policy agencies.  We commit to strengthen our National interagency coordination, cooperation, and information-sharing mechanisms needed in this regard, to support whole-of-government crisis response.
  • Support sharing relevant resources, expertise, and good practices, in order to strengthen global nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities, including relevant post-event mutual assistance.  Consistent with our respectiveinternational legal obligations,we the parties to this statementagree in principle to support--at the bilateral level, upon request--relevant expertise, training, or other related resources supporting nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilitieswith interested states, as well as offer relevant post-event mutual assistanceincluding through the IAEA Response and Assistance Network (RANET). We recognize that requests for bilateral assistance must be evaluated by the States involved on a case by case basis and would be subject to availability of resources, legal considerations, and other concerns.  However, we the parties to this statement recognize the importance of supporting nuclear terrorismpreparedness and response capacities and thus encourage bilateral and multilateral dialogue and coordination on how best to assure adequate global preparedness and response capabilities.As such, we also commit to making available relevant expertise or experience via international and multilateral effortsas the UN, IAEA, INTERPOL, GICNT, and the GP.  National Points of Contact will be provided, in addition to IAEA, INTERPOL, GICNT, and GP points of contact,to support the coordination and evaluation of requests and offers of assistance.
  • Support for international best practice guidance on preparedness and resilience objectives and the specific capabilities needed to meet them, as published by the organizations listed above,including the IAEA Nuclear Security Series 15 - Nuclear Security Recommendations on Nuclear and Other Radioactive Material out of Regulatory Control, the IAEA Safety Series GSR Part 7 on Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency and the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism’s Fundamentals for Establishing and Maintaining a Nuclear Security Response Framework ,which build on the aforementioned core competencies We the parties to this statement recognize these documents as an excellent foundation for States wishing to establish or sustain baseline nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities, and actively support the broadest possible international application and use of these documents.
  • Share lessons learned from real world incidents (i.e., nuclear and radiological incidents, materials out of regulatory control, significant all hazards-related emergency response efforts, etc.) that have implications for or applications to nuclear terrorism preparedness, response, and mitigation, in order to incorporate this experience into Preparedness and Response capabilities nationally and internationally.
  • Encourage and support National and State/local-level full field and table-top exercises aimed at ensuring nuclear terrorism preparedness and response capabilities.  As appropriate, participating countries to the exercises will encourage reciprocal, bilateral observation of National and transborder exercises, with a view towards sharing good practices in sustaining preparedness and response capabilities, while ensuring confidentiality of sensitive information.We the parties to this statementcommit, as far as resources permit, to host, observe, or support the development and implementation of radiological emergency management exercises (REMEX) under the GICNT’s Response and Mitigation Working Group.  REMEXs emphasize the importance of international cooperation in preparedness and resilience by providing the opportunity for two or more governments to collaboratively exercise response capabilities for nuclear terrorism with bilateral or multilateral scenarios.  REMEXs also provide a venue for sharing the good practices and lessons learned from other national and State/local-level exercises encouraged under this gift basket.  

Joint Statement on Nuclear Training and Support Centres

Joint statement on

Nuclear Security Training and Support Centres / Centres of Excellence 

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the United States, Vietnam, INTERPOL and the United Nations

 

Italy hosted the 2014 Gift Basket on Nuclear Security Training and Support Centres/Centres of Excellence (NSSC/CoE) following the 2012 Gift Basket hosted by the United States.  The 2014 Gift Basket attracted a large number of co-sponsoring Summit participants promoting the importance of nuclear security training and support centres, and the value of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Nuclear Security Training and Support Centres Network (NSSC Network) in strengthening international and regional cooperation and collaboration.  Now that the IAEA NSSC Network is maturing and a number of nuclear security training and support centers are being established, these centres can play an increasingly important and active role in promoting nuclear security.  These centres help meet domestic nuclear security needs, and can also provide an important platform for sharing resources and meeting needs on a regional basis, thus strengthening and sustaining the global nuclear security architecture.

In support of the IAEA NSSC Network and nuclear security training and support centre sustainability, the participants to the 2016 Nuclear Security Training and Support Centres / Centres of Excellence Gift Basket intend, within available resources, to support the following activities.

Strengthening of the IAEA NSSC Network

•    Nuclear security training and support centres not yet a member of the IAEA NSSC Network commit to join the Network and make every effort to take part in the IAEA NSSC Network activities, including meetings.

Establishment of regional networks

•    Building upon the establishment of the Asia Regional Network through the IAEA NSSC Network, establish additional networks with nuclear security training and support centres in the same region and mechanisms of regional coordination to promote best practices, exchange training experiences, share curricula and other activities on a regional basis. 

•    In collaboration with the IAEA NSSC network, share experiences in training with centres outside their region.

Strengthening nuclear security training and technical support programmes

•    Improve the quality of training by conducting peer review exchanges with other nuclear security training and support centres and by making use of the IAEA NSSC Network as a mechanism to promote peer-review exchanges.

•    Use IAEA material/guidance as a mechanism to achieve consistency in the technical content of the training programmes on nuclear security and participate in IAEA Train-the-Trainer activities to build a network of instructors qualified to deliver IAEA training course materials. 

•    Organize and be active participants in the development and running of nuclear and radiological security scenarios and exercises.

•    Share experiences and nuclear security training with other training centres and centres of excellence, as appropriate, as well as lessons learned through the IAEA NSSC network and IAEA Nuclear Security Information Portal (NUSEC).

•    Use IAEA material/guidance to support training programmes in key technical topics such as nuclear security culture, nuclear material accounting and control, computer security, transportation security, and insider threat mitigation. 

•    As appropriate, consider certification of nuclear security training and support centre training programmes, as per ISO 29990 and/or utilize applicable ISO best practices to support continuous improvement.
  
•    Collaborate with the Global Partnership’s Centre of Excellence Sub-working Group to implement this Gift Basket as noted in the Global Partnership Nuclear Security Summit Action Plan.

Sustainability

•    Focus attention on and build mechanisms to ensure the sustainability of nuclear security training and support centres, including developing business plans and e-learning tools, conducting needs analysis and regular evaluation of effectiveness, and identifying required financial, administrative and human resources.

•    Provide training, technical and scientific support to competent authorities to strengthen long-term sustainability of domestic nuclear and radiological security regimes. 

•    Broaden and strengthen international cooperation with the United Nations, especially United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540-related efforts, with INTERPOL, the Global Partnership, the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism and others.

Cooperation

•    Collaborate with educational institutions that teach nuclear security subjects to include nuclear security culture. Continue, improve, and expand the NSSC Network’s collaboration with the International Nuclear Security Education Network (INSEN).

•    Cooperate in the area of research and development with national and international institutes to promote scientific advancements in nuclear security and continuous engagement of the scientific communities.

•    Engage industry and civil society through constant dialogue on the importance of nuclear security.

•    Promote public confidence in nuclear and radiological security.

Joint Statement on Promoting Full and Universal Implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004)

Joint Statement on

Promoting Full and Universal Implementation of

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004)

2016 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington D.C.

Recognizing that United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540 (2004) and the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to UNSCR 1540 (hereinafter “1540 Committee”) are key parts of the international legal architecture for States to prevent and combat nuclear terrorism.

Noting that the full implementation of UNSCR 1540 is a long-term endeavour that requires both political and technical action at national, sub-regional, regional and international levels.

Recalling the 2010 Washington Nuclear Security Summit Communiqué and Work Plan, the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit Communiqué, the 2014 Hague Nuclear Security Summit Communiqué, and the follow-up Resolutions of UNSCR 1540, particularly UNSCR 1977 (2011), which underscored the important role of UNSCR 1540 in strengthening global nuclear security and reducing the threat of nuclear terrorism.

Noting that the 1540 Committee will be completing  its second Comprehensive Review in 2016 on the status of the implementation of UNSCR 1540, as set forth by UNSCR 1977 (2011). This Review provides an opportunity for the 1540 Committee to take stock of national and international progress in implementing UNSCR 1540 since the previous Comprehensive Review in 2009, and to put forward key findings and recommendations that will contribute to more effective implementation of UNSCR 1540.

Welcoming the contributions of States for updating and submitting reports on national implementation of UNSCR 1540 with the view of the 2016 Comprehensive Review on the implementation of UNSCR 1540.

Reaffirming our commitment to the Joint Statement on Promoting Full and Universal Implementation of UNSCR 1540 delivered at the 2014 Hague Nuclear Security Summit.

Noting that since the 2014 Hague Nuclear Security Summit, co-signatories have advanced national efforts to further the implementation of UNSCR 1540 by providing support for the 1540 Committee’s main areas of work, including, inter alia: monitoring implementation of the Resolution; providing capacity building assistance at the technical level to requesting States in implementing their UNSCR 1540 obligations; preparing and submitting UNSCR 1540 National Implementation Action Plans; organizing or supporting regional and sub-regional training seminars, exercises and initiatives; convening workshops to help facilitate the implementation of UNSCR 1540 into national legislation; conducting outreach to stakeholders in industry, civil society and academia; and strengthening cooperation with regional organizations such as the African Union, ASEAN, the Caribbean Community, and the European Union.

*  *  *

We, the Governments of Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States, with the support of the United Nations, the European Union and INTERPOL, reaffirm our commitment to the full and universal implementation of UNSCR 1540, including the implementation of obligations to enhance the security of nuclear materials worldwide in line with the objectives of the 2016 Washington Nuclear Security Summit Communiqué and institutional Action Plans. We reiterate our support for the activities of the 1540 Committee and the Group of Experts. We also reaffirm our commitment to fully implement UNSCR 1540 in our respective States, in areas where we have not already done so, and further undertake to:

1.       Work with and provide information to the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts for the 2016 Comprehensive Review on the status of the implementation of UNSCR 1540;

2.       Consider providing additional support and assistance in fulfilling the Action Plan in support of the United Nations, particularly actions aimed at facilitating national and regional implementation of UNSCR 1540 and its nuclear security obligations, with a view to helping requesting States to fully implement UNSCR 1540 by 2021, as referenced in the UNSC Presidential Statement of 7 May 2014;

3.       Encourage states to submit reports on national implementation of UNSCR 1540 on a regular basis, and focussing outreach on states yet to submit a first report to the 1540 Committee;

4.       Advocate for international, regional, and sub-regional organizations that have not yet done so to designate a Point of Contact (PoC) or coordinator on the implementation of UNSCR 1540 in order to facilitate regional approaches to assisting States in implementing their UNSCR 1540 obligations and enhance coordination for their UNSCR 1540 implementation efforts;

5.       Consider providing funding, where feasible, to organizations requesting for supporting their PoCs or coordinators for the implementation UNSCR 1540;

6.       Enhance coordination through outreach events with a wide range of domestic stakeholders such as industry, parliamentarians, civil society and academia, and develop appropriate ways to inform these stakeholders of their obligations pursuant to domestic laws relating to the implementation of UNSCR 1540;

7.       Consider organizing joint exercises at the national, regional or international levels that demonstrate ways of reinforcing national and regional capacities and international cooperation for better implementation of UNSCR 1540, and encourage the participation of relevant international organizations and initiatives;

8.       Advocate for the 1540 Committee to continue to strengthen cooperation with other relevant international organizations and initiatives, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, other United Nations entities, the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT), and the Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Material of Mass Destruction (Global Partnership), as well as regional and sub-regional organizations in promoting the implementation of the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit institutional Action Plans;

9.       Advocate for the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts to enhance their cooperation with other relevant entities in the United Nations system, such as the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)- and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), including through strengthening the legal framework to prohibit illicit activities, export controls, border security, and other measures that support obligations under UNSCR 1540, and the Counter-Terrorism Executive Directorate through joint country visits to monitor the implementation of UNSCR 1540;

10.    Consider further enhancing the cooperation between the International Atomic Energy Agency and the UNSCR 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts on strengthening nuclear security, through opportunities such as: enhancing complementarity and reducing duplication, including by using Integrated Nuclear Security Support Plans (INSSP) to inform voluntary 1540 National Implementation Action Plans; coordinating with the IAEA’s International Nuclear Security Education Network (INSEN) on outreach to academia relevant to implementing UNSCR 1540 and the IAEA’s Nuclear Security Support Center (NSSC) Network on outreach to nuclear security training centers; exploring establishing a liaison between the 1540 Committee and the IAEA’s Division of Nuclear Security;

11.    Advocate for the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts to continue collaborative efforts and interactions with INTERPOL regarding assistance requests and training opportunities;

12.    Advocate for the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts to continue to participate in GICNT exercises, workshops and events that focus on building and enhancing nuclear forensics, detection and response capabilities;

13.    Advocate for the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts to assist UN Member States to develop strong UNSCR 1540 assistance requests that are sufficiently detailed to support responses from potential assistance providers, including through the Global Partnership. In this context, consideration should be given to strengthening the 1540 Committee’s “match-making” mechanism and coordination with assistance providers, including at the regional level, through the Comprehensive Review of UNSCR 1540;

14.    Advocate for the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts to assist UN Member States to address new and emerging WMD threats relevant to the obligations and recommendations of the resolution; and

15.    Advocate for increased contributions, where feasible, to the UN Trust Fund for Global and Regional Disarmament Activities dedicated to supporting UNSCR 1540 implementation and the work of the 1540 Committee.

Joint Statement on Sustaining Action to Strengthen Global Nuclear Security Architecture

JOINT STATEMENT ON SUSTAINING ACTION TO

STRENGTHEN GLOBAL NUCLEAR SECURITY

The Nuclear Security Summit process has led to significant achievements in nuclear security at national, regional, and global levels; but the work of building a strengthened, sustained, and comprehensive global nuclear security architecture – consisting of legal instruments, international organizations and initiatives, internationally accepted guidance, and best practices – requires continuous attention.

We need sustained action and ambition on nuclear security after the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit to address continuing and evolving nuclear security challenges, with the objectives of advancing implementation of nuclear security commitments and building a strengthened, sustainable and comprehensive global nuclear security architecture.

The Governments of Argentina, Armenia, ­­­­­Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Republic of Korea, Romania, Poland, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam, and the following international organizations: INTERPOL and United Nations, aiming to facilitate cooperation and sustain activity on nuclear security after the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit, commit to:

  • Establish a Nuclear Security Contact Group; and
  • Designate an appropriately authorized and informed senior official or officials to participate in the Contact Group.

The Contact Group is tasked with:

  • Convening annually on the margins of the General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and, as may be useful, in connection with other related meetings;
  • Discussing a broad range of nuclear security-related issues, including identifying emerging trends that may require more focused attention;
  • Promoting and assessing implementation of nuclear security commitments, including those made during the Nuclear Security Summit process, reflected in the four Nuclear Security Summit Communiqués, the 2010 Washington Work Plan, the 2016 Action Plans, national commitments and associated joint statements, and gift baskets;
  • Developing and maintaining linkages to nongovernmental experts and nuclear industry; and,
  • Determining any additional steps that may be appropriate to support these goals.

The Contact Group may also consider and make recommendations to their respective leaders on convening any future Nuclear Security Summits.

We welcome the participation of all countries that subscribe to the goals set out in this Joint Statement and wish to contribute to the work of the Contact Group.

National Statement: Canada (French)

 

SOMMET SUR LA SÉCURITÉ NUCLÉAIRE 2016

DÉCLARATION NATIONALE

 

 

Le Canada reconnaît que le terrorisme nucléaire constitue l’une des menaces les plus graves pour la sécurité internationale. Un seul acte de terrorisme nucléaire ou radiologique pourrait avoir des conséquences catastrophiques sur les plans humanitaire et économique, à l’échelle tant locale que mondiale. Il est de la responsabilité des chefs de file mondiaux de prendre les mesures nécessaires pour éviter qu’une telle situation ne survienne.

 

            Le Sommet sur la sécurité nucléaire a fourni une tribune privilégiée aux chefs de file mondiaux qui leur a permis de prendre des engagements mutuels et de renforcer l’engagement pris au plus haut niveau pour assurer la sécurité des matières nucléaires. De concert, nous avons renforcé les efforts déployés à l’échelon international pour lutter contre le terrorisme nucléaire, amélioré la sécurité des matières nucléaires au niveau mondial et renforcé les institutions internationales qui sont partie intégrante de la structure mondiale en matière de sécurité nucléaire. Le Canada facilite la mise en application d’un cadre multilatéral solide pour la lutte internationale contre le terrorisme nucléaire, notamment des obligations contraignantes pour les États afin de renforcer la sécurité des matières nucléaires, cadrant avec les objectifs du Sommet sur la sécurité nucléaire. Ce quatrième Sommet a été considéré comme un « Sommet de transition » et vise à garantir que les réalisations atteintes soient durables.

 

Le Canada souscrit pleinement aux orientations de transition du Sommet sur la sécurité nucléaire visant à appuyer les institutions de la structure mondiale en matière de sécurité nucléaire : l’Agence internationale de l’énergie atomique (AIEA) qui joue un rôle clé de coordination dans le domaine de la sécurité nucléaire, l’Organisation des Nations Unies (ONU) en tant qu’organisme qui établit des normes, l’Organisation internationale de police criminelle (INTERPOL) en tant qu’organisme qui proscrit et qui lutte contre le crime, l’Initiative mondiale de lutte contre le terrorisme nucléaire (IMLTN) en tant que groupe qui possède un savoir-faire technique et le Partenariat mondial contre la prolifération des armes de destruction massive et des matières connexes (le Partenariat mondial) par lequel les donateurs coordonnent leurs efforts en matière d’assistance afin de traiter les problèmes qui se posent dans le domaine de la sécurité nucléaire. Nous reconnaissons que les engagements continus pris lors du Sommet et que la poursuite des travaux dans les années à venir requièrent une coordination continue. Après le Sommet, le Canada se joindra au Groupe sur la sécurité nucléaire, qui aidera à assurer une transition en douceur en offrant une tribune aux États; cette tribune leur permettra de cerner les lacunes dans la mise en œuvre des engagements pris lors du Sommet et de discuter des menaces émergentes et des enjeux sous-jacents.

J’ai le plaisir de confirmer que le Canada a, soit déjà honoré tous ses engagements nationaux établis lors des trois sommets précédents, ou est sur le point de les honorer, notamment sous la forme d’un financement de 28 millions de dollars pour améliorer la sécurité mondiale dans les domaines nucléaire et radiologique par l’intermédiaire de notre Programme de partenariat mondial. Dans le cadre de ce programme, citons le financement de 5,5 millions de dollars pour améliorer la sécurité physique des installations nucléaires en Asie du Sud-Est, celui de 12 millions de dollars pour prévenir le trafic illicite de matières nucléaires et radiologiques dans les Amériques et au Moyen-Orient et celui de 10,4 millions de dollars pour renforcer la sécurité des sources radioactives en Afrique, dans les Amériques, au Moyen-Orient et en Asie du Sud-Est. Un point important supplémentaire pour le Canada dans la mise en application des engagements pris lors du précédent Sommet a été l’organisation de notre première mission du Service consultatif international sur la protection physique (SCIPP) de l’AIEA en octobre 2015 aux fins d’évaluation de notre programme national en matière de sécurité nucléaire. Le rapport de mission a conclu que le programme national en matière de sécurité nucléaire est solide, résistant et durable. Le Canada encourage les États qui ne l’ont pas encore fait à organiser une mission SCIPP, et salue l’AIEA pour son approche collaborative et globale dans le soutien qu’elle apporte aux États membres à améliorer leur sécurité nucléaire nationale.

Nous prenons également d’autres mesures, à l’échelle tant nationale qu’internationale, qui démontrent notre leadership et notre engagement continus à l’égard des efforts mondiaux pour assurer la sécurité nucléaire et prévenir le terrorisme nucléaire. Le Canada demeure fermement résolu à réduire la prolifération d’uranium hautement enrichi et d’autres matières nucléaires sensibles, comme moyen pour accroître notre sécurité. Outre les engagements pris aux Sommets sur la sécurité nucléaire de 2010 et 2012, nous sommes sur le point de rapatrier l’uranium hautement enrichi provenant des États-Unis. Par ailleurs, l’Université de l’Alberta est en train de prendre des mesures afin d’arrêter son réacteur de recherche SLOWPOKE et de rapatrier son carburant d’uranium hautement enrichi aux États-Unis, ce qui va en réduire l’utilisation au Canada. Pour finir, le Canada a déterminé que les trois quarts de ses stocks de plutonium sont prêts à être éliminés, et il a entamé des discussions avec les États-Unis pour savoir s’ils accepteraient ces matières en vue d’une gestion à long terme. Le reste continuera d’être entreposé de manière sécuritaire et sera utilisé pour soutenir les futurs travaux en matière de recherche et développement.

 

Au-delà des engagements pris au Sommet sur la sécurité nucléaire de 2012, le Canada poursuit le développement de sa capacité nationale en criminalistique nucléaire – un élément clé dans l’enquête sur le trafic illicite des matières nucléaires et radioactives. Nous allons nous appuyer sur notre capacité existante et créer officiellement une bibliothèque dans le domaine de la criminalistique nucléaire ainsi que mettre sur pied un réseau de laboratoires en la matière qui seront en mesure d’appuyer la répression des actes de terrorisme nucléaire et de l’utilisation criminelle de matières nucléaires. Nous allons continuer à partager notre savoir-faire technique dans ce domaine avec d’autres États par le biais d’initiatives comme l’IMLTN.

 

Le Canada consacrera un montant supplémentaire de 42 millions de dollars dans le cadre du Programme de partenariat mondial au cours des deux prochaines années afin d’accroître la sécurité dans les domaines nucléaire et radiologique à l’échelle mondiale :

·       en luttant contre le trafic illicite grâce au renforcement des capacités nationales dans les Amériques et au Moyen-Orient;

·       en améliorant la sécurité physique aux installations nucléaires dans un certain nombre de pays;

·       en favorisant la gestion et l’élimination en toute sûreté des sources radioactives désaffectées dans les pays et régions où l’on relève des besoins en la matière, essentiellement dans les Amériques;

·       en supportant le Fonds de sécurité nucléaire de l’AIEA.

 

Outre ces engagements, le Canada se réjouit particulièrement d’avoir conjointement avec l’Espagne et la République de Corée, renouvelé un engagement sur la promotion de la mise en application complète et universelle de la résolution 1540 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies (RCSNU). Le Canada est pleinement convaincu que la RCSNU joue un rôle clé dans la lutte contre la prolifération nucléaire par des acteurs non gouvernementaux. Avec le Royaume-Uni, le Canada a dirigé un engagement conjoint sur la formation certifiée relativement à la promotion de la gestion de la sécurité nucléaire. Cet engagement souligne l’importance du World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) et des cours de formation certifiés dispensés par la WINS Academy aux gestionnaires et au personnel œuvrant dans le domaine de la sécurité nucléaire. Conjointement avec d’autres États qui ont fourni un soutien à l’Academy, le Canada encourage l’expansion du programme de certification offert par la WINS Academy.

 

Le terrorisme nucléaire continue d'être une menace à l’échelle mondiale qui requiert non seulement le déploiement d’efforts continus à l’échelle nationale, mais également une coopération internationale soutenue. Le Sommet a été l’occasion d’attirer l’attention des chefs de file mondiaux sur la question de la sécurité nucléaire et cela s’est traduit par des réductions substantielles du volume de matières nucléaires sensibles en circulation dans le monde. L’amélioration de la sécurité des matières nucléaires à l’échelle mondiale reste une priorité absolue pour le Canada. Nous exhortons tous les États, qu’ils aient participé ou non au Sommet sur la sécurité nucléaire, à poursuivre leurs efforts de contribution, au moyen de leurs systèmes nationaux et de toutes les institutions internationales pertinentes.

 

 

National Statement: Canada

 

2016 NUCLEAR SECURITY SUMMIT

NATIONAL STATEMENT

CANADA

                                                  

Canada recognizes nuclear terrorism as one of the gravest threats to international security. A single act of nuclear or radiological terrorism could have catastrophic humanitarian and economic consequences, both locally and globally. It is the responsibility of the world’s leaders to take all necessary steps to ensure that this does not happen.

 

            The Nuclear Security Summit process has provided a vital forum for leaders to engage with each other and reinforce commitment at the highest levels to securing nuclear materials. Together, we have enhanced international efforts to combat nuclear terrorism, improved the security of nuclear materials worldwide, and strengthened the international institutions that are integral to the global nuclear security architecture. Canada supports a strong multilateral framework for the global fight against nuclear terrorism, including binding obligations on States to enhance the security of nuclear materials, in line with the objectives of the Nuclear Security Summit. This fourth Summit has been characterized as a “transition Summit,” and will focus on ensuring that the achievements of the Summit process are sustained. 

 

Canada strongly endorses transitioning Nuclear Security Summit lines of effort to the institutions of the global nuclear security architecture: the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which plays a leading role coordinating nuclear security; the United Nations (UN), as the norm-building organization; the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), as a crime-tracking and interdicting body; the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT) as a group that develops technical expertise; and the Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (the Global Partnership), through which donors coordinate their assistance efforts for tackling nuclear security challenges. We recognize that sustaining Summit commitments and ensuring that work continues in the years ahead will require continued coordination. Canada will join the post-Summit “Nuclear Security Contact Group” which will help to ensure a smoother transition by providing a forum for States to identify gaps in the implementation of Summit commitments and discuss emerging threats and issues of concern. 

 

I am pleased to confirm that Canada has either already honoured or is in the process of fulfilling all national commitments made at the three previous Summits, including providing $28 million in funding to improve global nuclear and radiological security through our Global Partnership Program. Examples of this programming include $5.5 million to enhance the physical security of nuclear facilities in Southeast Asia, $12 million to prevent the illicit trafficking of nuclear and radiological material in the Americas and Middle East, and $10.4 million to promote the security of radioactive sources in Africa, the Americas, the Middle East and Southeast Asia. An additional highlight for Canada in the implementation of previous Summit commitments was the hosting of our first IAEA International Physical Protection Advisory Service (IPPAS) mission in October 2015, for the purpose of evaluating our domestic nuclear security regime. The mission report concluded that Canada’s nuclear security regime is robust, strong and sustainable. Canada encourages States that have not done so to host an IPPAS mission, and commends the IAEA on its comprehensive and collaborative approach to helping Member States enhance domestic nuclear security. 

 

We are also taking further steps, both at national and international levels, to demonstrate ongoing leadership and commitment to global efforts to advance nuclear security and prevent nuclear terrorism.  Canada remains dedicated to minimizing highly enriched uranium (HEU) and other sensitive nuclear materials, as a means of further enhancing our security. Further to commitments made at the 2010 and 2012 Nuclear Security Summits, we are on-track to repatriate United States (U.S.)-origin HEU. In addition, the University of Alberta is taking steps to decommission its SLOWPOKE research reactor and repatriate its HEU fuel to the U.S., which will further reduce the use of HEU in Canada. Finally, Canada has assessed that approximately three-quarters of its inventory of plutonium is ready for dispositioning, and has initiated discussions with the U.S. to determine whether it would accept the material for long-term management. The remainder would continue to be safely stored and used to support future research and development work.

 

Beyond the commitments made at the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit, Canada is in the process of further developing its national nuclear forensics capability – a key element in the investigation of illicit trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials. We will build on existing capacity and formally create a national nuclear forensics library and a network of nuclear forensics laboratories that will be able to support the prosecution of acts of nuclear terrorism and the criminal use of nuclear materials. We will continue to share our technical expertise in this area with other States through initiatives such as the GICNT.

 

Canada will be dedicating an additional $42 million in Global Partnership Program funding over the next two years to continue to improve nuclear and radiological security worldwide by:

·       combating illicit trafficking through strengthening national capacities in the Americas and the Middle East;

·       improving physical security at nuclear facilities in a number of countries;

·       promoting safe management and disposal of disused radioactive sources in countries and regions with identified needs, primarily in the Americas; and

·       supporting the IAEA’s Nuclear Security Fund.

 

In addition to these commitments, Canada is very pleased to have jointly led a renewal of a gift basket with Spain and the Republic of Korea on the full and universal implementation of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540. Canada strongly believes that UNSCR 1540 is a key component in countering nuclear proliferation by non-state actors. Canada also led a gift basket with the United Kingdom on certified training for nuclear security management. This gift basket underscores the importance of the World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) and the certified training courses provided by the WINS Academy for managers and personnel involved in nuclear security. Along with other States that have provided support to the Academy, Canada encourages the further expansion of the WINS Academy’s certification program.

 

Nuclear terrorism remains a global threat that requires not only continued national efforts, but also sustained international cooperation. The Summit process has brought the issue of nuclear security to the forefront of world leaders’ attention, and has resulted in real reductions in the amount of vulnerable nuclear material in the world. Enhancing the security of nuclear materials worldwide will remain a top priority for Canada. We call on all States, whether they have been part of the Nuclear Security Summit process or not, to contribute to these vital efforts, both through their domestic systems and all relevant international institutions.

Joint Statement on Certified Training

Joint Statement on Certified Training for Nuclear Security Management
2016 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington D.C.

Introduction

Gathered in Washington D.C. on the occasion of the fourth Nuclear Security Summit, the leaders of Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States welcome the progress that has been made by states to commit to the effective and sustainable implementation of the essential elements of nuclear security guidance, particularly in the area of ensuring that management and personnel with accountability for nuclear security are demonstrably competent.   

At the 2014 Hague Nuclear Security Summit, thirty five states sponsored a Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation.  The aim of this Joint Statement was for Subscribing States, at their own discretion, to meet the intent of the essential elements of a nuclear security regime and to commit to the effective and sustainable implementation of the principles therein. The Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation was subsequently published by the IAEA in 2014 as INFCIRC/869 and is open for any IAEA Member State to support.

One of the four key commitments outlined in the Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation is for Subscribing States to “Ensure that management and personnel with accountability for nuclear security are demonstrably competent.” The challenges associated with managing nuclear and other radiological materials are complex, and it is essential that States ensure that such materials remain secure. The Joint Statement outlines two ways in which States can support the training of effective and competent managers of those materials and related facilities:

  • Maintaining and continuously improving domestic or regional training through education, certification and/or qualification activities; and
  • Supporting or participating in the development of World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) best practice guides and training activities.

In support of the commitments in the Joint Statement on Strengthening Nuclear Security Implementation, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States, together with a number of corporations and foundations, joined together to establish the WINS Academy, the world’s first structured professional development and certification program for nuclear security managers. The first training module of the WINS Academy was launched at the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit.

Since its launch at the 2014 Summit, and with support from Nuclear Security Summit participating States, corporations and foundations, the WINS Academy has developed a robust international nuclear security certification program.  The training program is designed to develop a network of certified professionals who are implementing meaningful and sustainable changes to security culture and best practices worldwide. To date, 560 participants from 75 countries have registered in the WINS Academy certification program.   

Next Steps

In support of the commitments in INFCIRC/869, and acknowledging the international recognition of the need for nuclear security training, education, certification and/or qualification activities, this gift basket records the intent of Canada, Finland, Hungary, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States to undertake to further support the WINS Academy in its efforts to expand its international certification program, including through the provision of advocacy, peer review support, contributions, or by other means as necessary.  

The States listed above also recognize and undertake to promote cooperative efforts between the WINS Academy and the IAEA, including: WINS cooperation with the IAEA Nuclear Security Support Centre (NSSC) Working Group on Best Practices, whose 2014-2015 Action Plan includes the development of a program to collect lessons learned case studies from NSSC members; and WINS Academy cooperation with the IAEA’s International Nuclear Security Education Network (INSEN), which has helped academics connect and collaborate with WINS to help develop blended courses leading to joint certification.

We welcome other States, supported by industry and civil society, to provide a tangible commitment in support of the WINS Academy and certified professional development for nuclear security. Together we can help to ensure that nuclear and other radioactive materials remain secure under the management of demonstrably competent professionals.

National Progress Report: Canada

2016 Nuclear Security Summit
National Progress Report
Canada
(March 2016)

Since the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit (NSS), Canada has strengthened nuclear security implementation domestically and significantly contributed to global nuclear security.

1.  Strengthened Nuclear and Other Radiological Material Security

a)    Nuclear Security

Vulnerable supplies of weapons-usable nuclear materials pose a significant international security threat given the potential for non-state actors to acquire and use them for malicious purposes. Physical protection of nuclear and radiological materials includes securing these goods against theft or sabotage, during use, storage, or transport.

Canada is committed to maintaining a world-class domestic nuclear safety and security system. Canada hosted its first International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) International Physical Protection Advisory Service (IPPAS) mission from October 19-30, 2015. The IPPAS mission reviewed Canada’s regulatory and legislative framework for the security of nuclear facilities and material and visited nuclear power and research reactors to assess their physical protection systems. The mission concluded that Canada’s nuclear security regime was strong, resilient and sustainable.

The 2016 Nuclear Threat Initiative’s Nuclear Materials Security index ranks Canada third globally with respect to securing nuclear materials from the risks of both theft and sabotage. Canada continues to improve, having increased its score by 2 points from 2014, due to strengthened cyber security regulations and regulatory assessments for nuclear facilities, and by 8 points from 2012.

Canada is in the process of updating its March 2014 Design Basis Threat Analysis for nuclear high security facilities, building on international benchmarking and increased collaboration with domestic partners. Canada is also contributing to the revision of the IAEA’s nuclear security guidance on the Development, Use and Maintenance of the Design Basis Threat.

Canada continues to enhance its fitness for duty requirements for nuclear facility personnel and will expand the target population for these beyond nuclear security forces at high security sites. The expanded requirements are expected to address substance abuse (impairment at the workplace) screening, hours of work monitoring, and physical, medical and psychological screening for an expanded worker population at nuclear power plants.  

As part of the $28 million commitment made at the 2014 NSS to enhance nuclear and radiological security internationally, Canada’s Global Partnership Program (GPP) invested $5.2 million in key physical protection upgrades at vulnerable nuclear facilities in Southeast Asia to help prevent the theft of nuclear materials. This support has resulted in strengthened physical protection of nuclear facilities through infrastructure upgrades and enhanced emergency response capabilities in the event of radiological accidents.

b)    Radiological Security

Canada is one of the world’s largest suppliers of highly radioactive sealed sources and supports their protection from potential loss, theft and malicious use. As part of the $28 million commitment made by Canada at the 2014 NSS to enhance nuclear and radiological security, Canada’s GPP has contributed $7 million to strengthen the security and management of highly radioactive sources by enhancing physical security and local capacity, including through the provision of training, equipment and infrastructure. These projects have focused on countries with inventories of Canadian-origin material in Africa, the Americas, and Southeast Asia.

Canada continues its efforts to implement IAEA security requirements for radiological sources with Canadian industry. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s (CNSC) regulatory document “Security of Nuclear Substances: Sealed Sources” is fully aligned with the IAEA’s Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources.

Canada continues to support IAEA and World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) training courses and workshops to assist other States to develop the competencies necessary for comprehensive radioactive source security. Canada participates in exchanges of information on programmes and technical solutions for improving the security of radioactive sources.

c)    Transport Security

Further to a 2014 NSS joint statement on transport security of nuclear and radiological materials, Canada participated in the NSS Transport Security gift basket and contributed to good practice guides on the security of transport for civilian nuclear and other radioactive materials. These guides will be shared with other countries at the 2016 NSS, through the IAEA and the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT), to inform future activity in this area. 

Additionally, Canada co-sponsored the 2014 NSS maritime security joint statement and participated in the November 16-19, 2015 Wilton Park workshop which formulated recommendations to enhance the security of the global maritime supply chain, particularly through deterring, detecting and responding to nuclear and other radioactive materials out of regulatory control. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) delivered a presentation on Canada’s maritime detection architecture and related experiences.

Canada’s GPP will contribute to transportation security projects, including the possibility of funding the provision of containers to safely and securely transport and consolidate radioactive sources into long-term storage.

Canada continues to support IAEA and WINS training courses and workshops to assist other States to develop the competencies necessary for a comprehensive security regime for the transport of nuclear and other radioactive material.

d)    Nuclear Forensics Capabilities

Should nuclear or radioactive materials not under regulatory control be interdicted in Canada, it is essential for the Government of Canada to be able to identify where this material came from, the nature of the material, and the risks it poses so that the related security threat can be addressed. Nuclear forensics is therefore a key element in responding to illicit trafficking of nuclear materials.

Further to its commitment at the 2012 NSS to promote the development of a national nuclear forensics capability, the Canadian National Nuclear Forensics Capability Project (CNNFCP) was started in May 2013 to help establish a national network of nuclear forensics laboratories and a national nuclear forensics library. The CNNFCP will conclude its research and development activities by the end of March 2016. The next step will be to build on existing capacity and formally create a network of nuclear forensics laboratories and a national nuclear forensics library. The Defence Research and Development Canada’s Centre for Security Science and the CNSC are leading these efforts. The CNSC has committed to maintaining and operating a national nuclear forensics library on behalf of the Government of Canada.

e)    Information and cyber security

In addition to protecting sensitive and classified nuclear information in all its forms, Canada believes that the protection of critical systems and equipment is important to nuclear safety, nuclear security, and emergency preparedness and response.

Canada has developed a national standard (CSA N290.7) to address cyber security at nuclear power plants and small reactor facilities. This standard was published in December 2014. Furthermore, nuclear power plant operators in Canada have in place cyber security programs aligned with international standards and best practices.

Canada hosted an IAEA National Training Course on Computer Security and Conducting Assessments in December 2015, with industry, regulator and government partner participants. This included a methodology for conducting computer security assessments at nuclear facilities that is consistent with international standards, IAEA guidance and recognized best practices regarding the protection of information and industrial control systems. Canada has robust procedures in this area, but believes that more work needs to be done to raise standards globally. Canada supports the efforts of the IAEA and WINS to develop such guidance for state-level government departments and agencies, regulatory bodies, nuclear facility operators, and research and educational institutes.

2.  Contribution to Minimization of Sensitive Nuclear Materials

Minimizing the global stocks of highly-enriched uranium (HEU) and separated plutonium will help prevent non-state actors from acquiring such materials, thereby reducing the risk of nuclear terrorism. Canada remains committed to the minimization of HEU and has made strong progress domestically and internationally.

Canada is committed to eliminating the use of HEU in the production of medical isotopes. Canada has announced that it will cease the routine production of molybdenum 99 (Mo-99) from Atomic Energy Canada Limited’s (AECL) Chalk River National Research Universal reactor in October 2016, and will remove this facility as a potential supplier of last resort in the international Mo-99 supply chain by March 2018, thereby ending HEU-based medical isotope production in Canada. The government continues to work to ensure a reliable global supply of medical isotopes.

At the 2010 NSS, Canada committed to repatriate its United States (U.S.)-origin HEU fuel stored at Chalk River Laboratories and has made good progress in implementing this repatriation initiative. Canada repatriated one shipment of used HEU fuel in 2010, another in 2012, and four more in 2015. The last and largest phase of the repatriation initiative for used HEU fuel started in August 2015, and is slated to conclude in May 2019. 

Following Canada’s March 2012 announcement of the expansion of the repatriation initiative, to include the return of additional HEU materials stored at Chalk River Laboratories, a second initiative was launched to repatriate AECL’s inventory of HEU-bearing liquids that were generated as a by-product from medical isotope production. Shipments of HEU-bearing liquids are scheduled to commence in mid-2016, and be completed by May 2019.

Furthermore, the University of Alberta is taking steps to decommission its SLOWPOKE research reactor which operates on HEU fuel. The University of Alberta plans to repatriate the HEU fuel by May 2019. Once the decommissioning of the University of Alberta’s research reactor has been completed, Canada will have only one remaining HEU-fueled research reactor.

Canada has assessed that approximately three-quarters of its inventory of plutonium is ready for dispositioning, and has initiated discussions with the U.S. to determine whether it would accept the material for long-term management. The remainder will continue to be safely stored and will be used to support future research and development work. 

Internationally, Canada assisted a U.S.-led reactor conversion and cleanout project for an HEU-fuelled SLOWPOKE research reactor in Jamaica, which was completed in October 2015.

3.   Enhanced Efforts to Combat Illicit Trafficking in Nuclear and Radiological Materials

Increased efforts and capacity to prevent, detect and interdict illicitly trafficked nuclear and radiological materials are necessary to reduce the risk of non-state actors acquiring and using these materials in nuclear weapons or radiological dispersal devices. The CBSA is upgrading Canada’s Radiation Detection Network (RADNet) to help prevent illicit trafficking. RADNet scans nearly all commercial marine containers entering Canada for the presence of radiation using stand-alone, automated radiation detection portals at the major marine ports. The CBSA is replacing aging equipment with advanced-radiation portal monitors, which enable greater sensitivity and source characterization to improve Canada’s ability to combat the illicit trafficking of radiological material. Canada also participates in international information sharing on illicit trafficking in nuclear material through contributions to the IAEA Incident and Trafficking Database and bilateral cooperation.

Canada continues to implement a risk-based security compliance program for licensing of radioactive sources, and has implemented comprehensive import and export control programs for both Category 1 and 2 radioactive sources.

As part of the $28 million Canadian commitment made at the 2014 NSS to enhance nuclear and radiological security, Canada’s GPP has contributed $15 million to strengthen the capacities of partner countries to detect and interdict illicit cargos of nuclear and radiological materials. This includes the provision of $12.2 million to support the purchase of vehicle-based and man-portable radiation monitoring and detection equipment, and the installation of radiation portal monitors at key border crossings in Jordan. Canada’s GPP has also provided $2.3 million to support counter nuclear smuggling (CNS) initiatives in Peru, and has contributed funding to The International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) for the delivery of training programmes in Southeast Asia and Jordan to help disrupt illicit trafficking activities. This support enhanced the security of border crossings in Jordan and mitigated the risk of illicit trafficking of nuclear and radiological material in the region.

Further to Canada’s co-sponsorship of the 2014 NSS gift basket on CNS, Canada participated in a workshop on CNS teams in vulnerable regions held in Amman, Jordan in November 2015. Participants exchanged experiences on the challenges in conducting investigations and operations to locate and secure illicitly trafficked nuclear or radioactive material. Canada also participated in the March 2016 CNS workshop held in Karlsruhe, Germany and hosted by the U.S. and the European Commission. This three day workshop addressed crime scene management and laboratory analysis of interdicted material with a focus on ensuring that nuclear smuggling investigations lead to successful prosecutions.

4.   Support for International Legal Instruments

a)    CPPNM/A and ICSANT

Canada believes that the universal implementation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (ICSANT) would significantly augment existing global counter-terrorism efforts. Accordingly, Canada enacted legislation in 2013, known as Bill S-9 (the Nuclear Terrorism Act), which enabled Canada to ratify both the CPPNM/A and ICSANT. This legislation amended the Criminal Code in order to create a number of new offences related to nuclear terrorism, in accordance with the CPPNM/A and ICSANT.

Canada also continues to advocate for a strong multilateral framework for the global fight against nuclear terrorism, supporting IAEA efforts to promote the entry into force of the 2005 Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (CPPNM/A) and encouraging States that have not yet done so to ratify the CPPNM/A as soon as possible.

Internationally, Canada has shared its experience on the development and design of its Nuclear Terrorism Act, highlighting obstacles and how they were overcome, to help other States facilitate their own legislative efforts. Since October 2011, Canada’s GPP has provided $720,000 towards six regional workshops and provided follow-up assistance for the purpose of assisting other countries with the implementation of CPPNM/A and ICSANT through identifying and addressing obstacles to ratification. These workshops facilitated the ratification of the CPPNM/A by eight countries.

b)    UN Security Council Resolution 1540

Canada supports the full and universal implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540 as a key tool in the global fight against weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferation and terrorism. The Resolution imposes several binding obligations on States to establish and maintain domestic controls to enhance the security of nuclear materials, in line with the objectives of the NSS.

At the 2014 NSS, Canada and the Republic of Korea welcomed the support of 32 countries and the UN for the joint statement on the full and universal implementation of UNSCR 1540. This joint statement encouraged participating States to offer assistance to help other States implement the nuclear security provisions of UNSCR 1540 and to advance key 1540 Committee priorities. Canada also circulated the joint statement at the May 7, 2014, UNSC Special Session on the 10th anniversary of UNSCR 1540, where the text was submitted to the UNSC for inclusion in its record of the debate. At the 2016 NSS, Canada worked with Spain and the Republic of Korea to renew the 2014 joint statement on UNSCR 1540 with a 2016 joint statement outlining further voluntary actions for States to undertake, such as advocating for better coordination and cooperation between the 1540 Committee and key international nuclear security organizations and institutions.

Canada’s GPP works closely with the 1540 Committee to look for ways to address outstanding needs for the implementation of UNSCR 1540, including a coordination role for the 1540 Committee. To this end, Canada welcomes the regular participation of 1540 Committee experts in recent Global Partnership Working Group meetings, and strongly supports the 1540 Committee’s ongoing efforts to achieve the universal implementation of 1540.

Canada’s GPP programming unit for UNSCR 1540 works to reduce the threat posed by terrorist acquisition of WMDs and related material by increasing States’ capacities to prevent the proliferation of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) weapons and their means of delivery, and establish domestic controls over related materials to prevent their illicit trafficking. The three main pillars of the GPP UNSCR 1540 programming unit are: 1) providing CBRN related training and equipment; 2) providing legislative and regulatory assistance for CBRN-related treaties; and 3) enhancing export controls and border security. This GPP programming unit also works with the UNSCR 1540 Committee to respond to UN Member States’ requests for assistance.

Domestically, Canada has provided the UNSCR 1540 Committee with an updated UNSCR 1540 National Implementation Action Plan further to a commitment made at the 2014 NSS. This plan outlines both domestic and international plans and priorities for implementing provisions of UNSCR 1540, which will further enhance Canada’s ability to prevent WMD proliferation and terrorism.

5.   Contribution To and Use of the IAEA’s Nuclear Security-Related Activities and Services

Canada currently ranks as the third-largest national contributor to the IAEA’s Nuclear Security Fund, having contributed over $20.6 million through the GPP since 2004. Results include: physical upgrades to radiological security and associated facilities; radiological source recovery and end-of-life management; enhanced physical security and the lock-down of weapons–usable materials at nuclear sites; and enhanced capacities of Member States to manage and respond to nuclear and radiological threats. Canada actively contributes to the development of the IAEA’s Nuclear Security Series, most recently by participating in the Nuclear Security Guidance Committee and assisting in the development of documents within the Nuclear Security Series. Canada also supported the revision of international guidance on measures against the insider threat, facilitated the development of related training materials and instructed at an international training course.

In 2014, Canada participated in and provided support for the organization of the International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Forensics. In June 2015, Canada participated in the International Conference on Computer Security in a Nuclear World: Expert Discussion and Exchange. Canada led a computer security demonstration, chaired a Main Session and two Technical Sessions and presented six papers. Canada welcomes the 2016 International Conference on Nuclear Security to be held in December 2016 and will participate actively in the Conference by supporting renewed engagement by IAEA Member States to tackle the challenge of nuclear security in light of new threats and challenges.

a)    IPPAS Mission

Further to a commitment made at the 2014 NSS in The Hague, Canada hosted its first IAEA International Physical Protection Advisory Service (IPPAS) mission from October 19-30, 2015. At Canada’s request, the IPPAS mission reviewed all five IPPAS modules, including Canada’s security-related legislative and regulatory regime for nuclear material and nuclear facilities, as well as the security arrangements applied to the transport of nuclear material, the security of radioactive material and associated facilities and activities, and the information and computer security systems in place. The team visited several facilities, including power reactors and research reactors, to review physical protection systems.

The IPPAS Mission’s final report provides a comprehensive overview of Canada’s nuclear security regime which it assesses as robust, resilient and sustainable. Canada values the IPPAS mission’s report and findings, noting in particular the opportunity to further hone our nuclear security regime and share our good practices. Canada remains a strong proponent of the voluntary disclosure of information from IPPAS missions in order to better build up a global repository of best practices and lessons learned and will publish a publicly available summary of the IPPAS mission report. Canada values the creation and implementation of IAEA Nuclear Security Guidance documents and supports continuously improving physical protection and nuclear security both nationally and globally. To this end, Canada has assisted the IAEA in its undertaking of IPPAS missions to other countries including the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Hungary, Romania, the U.S. and Australia.

b)    Nuclear Security Support Centre

Nuclear Security Support Centres (NSSC) can help to ensure sustainable and effective nuclear security by facilitating the development of the necessary knowledge, expertise and skills for personnel with a responsibility for nuclear security. Canada therefore continues to support the IAEA in its efforts to establish NSSCs and provided a presentation at the August 2015 working group meeting on the Canadian Regulatory Framework and training of personnel at nuclear facilities.

The CNSC is continuing to explore the establishment of a virtual NSSC to help ensure sustainable and effective nuclear security. In May 2015, a workshop on “Meeting Canadian Commitments for Demonstrable Competency in Nuclear Security Regulation and Implementation” was held with participation from Canadian nuclear security stakeholders and WINS with the goal of creating a common competency framework and professional development curriculum for nuclear security regulators and licensees.

6.   Support for Nuclear Security-Related International Activities

Canada participates in all major nuclear security-related international activities, including the G-7 Nuclear Safety and Security Group (G-7 NSSG), the GICNT, the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), INTERPOL and the Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (GP) and works with the UNSCR 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts.

a)   Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction

In recognition of the threat posed by terrorist acquisition of weapons and materials of mass destruction (WMD) the then-G8 launched the GP under Canada’s leadership at the 2002 Kananaskis Summit. Canada is an active participant in the GP and co-chairs the Global Partnership Expansion and Outreach Working Group.

Canada’s GPP supports the GP with projects to prevent WMD proliferation and reduce the threat posed by CBRN  terrorism. The GPP implements projects worldwide in priority areas including: nuclear and radiological security; biological security; and support for the implementation of UNSCR 1540 and chemical weapons destruction.

To date, Canada’s GPP has spent over $1.2 billion on WMD threat reduction programming. At the 2014 NSS, Canada committed $28 million to further nuclear security programming, which has been fully disbursed and resulted in enhanced physical security of nuclear facilities, with a focus on Southeast Asia, mitigation of the illicit trafficking of nuclear and radiological material in the Middle East, and enhanced the security of radioactive sources in Latin America.

At the 2016 NSS, Canada is pleased to announce $42 million in additional projects to further enhance nuclear and radiological security, and maintain momentum beyond the NSS process.

b)   Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism

Canada is committed to the GICNT goal of strengthening global capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to nuclear terrorism. Canada is an active participant in GICNT events and exercises, including the Implementation and Assessment Group meetings and the GICNT biennial plenary meetings. Canada continues to lead in the development of technical advances in the area of nuclear forensics, and works closely with the GICNT Nuclear Forensics Working Group. For instance, Canada played a leading role in the development and delivery of technical exercises, including “Mystic Deer” in Budapest in October 2014 and “Glowing Tulip” in The Hague in March 2015. “Glowing Tulip” demonstrated the utility of strong legal provisions for criminalizing material out of regulatory control, highlighted good practices for laboratory management of forensics evidence, and provided partner countries with tools and information to increase the capacity of their national laboratories to provide expert testimony in a court of law.

Canada has also supported cross disciplinary events, such as the “Radiant City” event held in Karlsruhe, Germany, in May 2015, which examined the interplay between the areas of nuclear detection and forensics. Canada will continue its support of the GICNT by providing additional technical expertise for GICNT activities, such as Nuclear Forensics and Nuclear Detection work and other technical nuclear security work of the GICNT working groups.

c)   Proliferation Security Initiative

Canada continues to work with other Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) partners to enhance collective abilities to disrupt illicit shipments of nuclear and radiological weapons and related materials by sea, land, and air. This is accomplished through capacity-building exercises, the exchange of information and best practices, and participation in practical exercises. In September 2014, Canada funded a regional PSI Seminar in the Caribbean that brought together CARICOM partners to encourage their participation in the PSI and to enhance WMD interdiction-relevant capabilities and cooperation in the region. Canada also hosted the PSI Operational Experts Group (OEG) meeting in Ottawa in May 2015, which helped to focus PSI efforts on new proliferation challenges, including proliferation financing and intangible technology transfer. Domestically, Canada will continue to share domestic lessons learned learnt with partners and contribute materials to the Critical Capabilities and Practices (CCP) Tools and Resources Library.

7.    Partnering with External Stakeholders

a)   Cooperation between Government and Nuclear Industry

Given the important role played by the nuclear sector in ensuring that standards in nuclear security are upheld, Canada continues to place emphasis on strong cooperation between industry and government. This helps to ensure relevance and transparency in the creation of domestic compliance systems for both nuclear safety and nuclear security. Ongoing efforts to phase out the use of HEU-based production of medical isotopes in Canada is one example of close cooperation between government and industry.

The Government of Canada has invested approximately $60 million to support research and the development of alternatives to HEU technologies in the production of medical isotopes technologies, as well as to encourage their uptake by industry. Specific investments in alternative production technologies that do not use HEU and reduce radioactive waste in isotope production include the Non-Reactor-Based Isotope Supply Contribution Program (2010 – 2012) and the Isotope Technology Acceleration Program (2012 – 2016) by Natural Resources Canada. Additional efforts have been directed towards developing cyclotrons and linear accelerators for use in the production of the key medical isotope, technetium-99m. Partners in these programs have upgraded infrastructure and equipment, and are now undertaking the clinical trials necessary for licensing. These cooperative efforts aim to reduce the use of HEU as well as to achieve a more diverse and secure supply of isotopes.

Additionally, Canada participates in five multilateral export control regimes aimed at preventing the export of goods and technology that can be used in WMD programs or delivery systems: the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and Zangger Committee (ZC), the Australia Group (AG), the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and the Wassenaar Arrangement (WA). Under these arrangements, Canada has undertaken measures to control export of goods and technology in order to ensure that they are not used in WMD programs or delivery systems, and provided information to exporters regarding implementation of requirements under the Export and Import Permits Act and the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, which codify in Canadian law Canada’s political commitments made through participation in the five foregoing regimes.

b)    Partnership with NGOs

Canada was one of the founding donors to the WINS Academy, a leader in professional development and certification for nuclear security management, and continues to provide financial and technical support. Further to a commitment made at the 2014 NSS, Canada’s GPP provided funding towards a project with the WINS to develop a competency framework for personnel and management with accountabilities for nuclear security. A related best practice guide was published in 2015. In the context of the 2016 NSS, Canada has worked with the United Kingdom and other contributors to the WINS Academy to issue a gift basket which encourages expansion of WINS’ international certification program, and urges NSS participating states to contribute to the Academy’s continued development.

National Progress Report: Canada (French)

 

SOMMET SUR LA SÉCURITÉ NUCLÉAIRE 2016

RAPPORT D’ÉTAPE NATIONAL

CANADA

(Mars 2016)

Depuis le Sommet sur la sécurité nucléaire (SSN) de 2014, le Canada a renforcé la mise en œuvre de la sécurité nucléaire sur la scène nationale et a contribué de manière importante à la sécurité nucléaire mondiale.

 

1.     RENFORCEMENT DE LA SÉCURITÉ DES MATIÈRES NUCLÉAIRES ET D’AUTRES PRODUITS RADIOLOGIQUES

a)    SÉCURITÉ NUCLÉAIRE

L’approvisionnement vulnérable de matières nucléaires militaires représente une menace internationale importante en matière de sécurité étant donné le risque que des acteurs non étatiques se les procurent et en fassent usage à des fins malveillantes. La protection physique des matières nucléaires et radiologiques comprend la protection contre le vol ou le sabotage au cours de leur utilisation, de leur entreposage ou de leur transport.

 

Le Canada s’engage à préserver un système national de sûreté et de sécurité nucléaire de niveau international. Le Canada a accueilli sa première mission du Service consultatif international sur la protection physique (SCIPP) de l’Agence internationale de l’énergie atomique (AIEA) du 19 au 30 octobre 2015. La mission du SCIPP a examiné le cadre réglementaire et législatif du Canada sur la sécurité des installations et des matières nucléaires et a visité des centrales nucléaires et des réacteurs de recherche afin d’évaluer leurs systèmes de protection physique. La mission a permis de conclure que le programme national en matière de sécurité nucléaire était résistant, résilient et durable.

 

L’indice mondial de sécurité des matières nucléaires de 2016 de l’Initiative contre la menace nucléaire a placé le Canada au deuxième rang mondial en ce qui a trait à la sécurité des matières nucléaires par rapport aux risques de vol et de sabotage. Le Canada continue de s’améliorer, ayant augmenté son pointage de 2 points depuis 2014, en raison du renforcement des règles de sécurité informatique et des évaluations réglementaires des installations nucléaires, et de 8 points par rapport à 2012.

 

Le Canada est en train de mettre à jour son Analyse de la menace de référence de mars 2014 pour les installations nucléaires de sécurité élevée, en se basant sur l’analyse comparative internationale et la collaboration accrue avec les partenaires nationaux. Le Canada contribue également à la révision de documents sur la sécurité nucléaire de l’AIEA sur l’élaboration, l’utilisation et l’entretien de la menace de référence.

 

Le Canada continue d’améliorer ses exigences d’aptitude au travail pour le personnel des installations nucléaires et élargira la population cible pour ces dernières au-delà des forces de sécurité nucléaire dans les sites à sécurité élevée. Les exigences élargies devraient traiter le dépistage de la toxicomanie (facultés affaiblies sur le lieu de travail), la surveillance des heures de travail et le dépistage physique, médical et psychologique pour une population de travailleur élargie dans les centrales nucléaires.

 

Dans le cadre de l’engagement de 28 millions de dollars réalisé lors du SSN de 2014 visant à rehausser la sécurité nucléaire et radiologique à l’échelle internationale, le Programme de partenariat mondial (PPM) du Canada a investi 5,2 millions de dollars dans la mise à niveau clé de la protection physique dans les installations nucléaires vulnérables de l’Asie du Sud-Est pour aider à prévenir le vol de matières nucléaires. Ce soutien a entraîné un renforcement de la protection physique des installations nucléaires grâce à des mises à niveau des infrastructures et à l’amélioration des capacités d’intervention d’urgence dans le cas d’accidents radiologiques.

 

b)    SÉCURITÉ RADIOLOGIQUE

Le Canada est l’un des principaux fournisseurs de sources scellées fortement radioactives et il appuie leur protection contre les pertes, les vols et les usages malveillants potentiels. Dans le cadre de l’engagement du Canada de 28 millions de dollars réalisé lors du SSN de 2014 dans le but de rehausser la sécurité nucléaire et radiologique, le PPM du Canada a accordé 7 millions de dollars pour renforcer la sécurité et la gestion de sources fortement radioactives en améliorant la sécurité physique et la capacité locale, notamment en offrant des formations, de l’équipement et des infrastructures. Ces projets ont mis l’accent sur des pays ayant des stocks de matières d’origine canadienne en Afrique, en Amérique et en Asie du Sud-Est.

 

Le Canada poursuit ses efforts de mise en œuvre des exigences de sécurité de l’AIEA pour les sources radiologiques avec l’industrie canadienne. Le document réglementaire de la Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire (CCSN) intitulé « La sécurité des substances nucléaires : sources scellées » reflète entièrement le Code de conduite sur la sûreté et la sécurité des sources radioactives de l’AIEA.

 

Le Canada continue d’appuyer les formations de l’AIEA et du World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) pour aider d’autres États à développer les compétences nécessaires à la sécurité globale des sources radioactives. Le Canada participe aux échanges de renseignements sur les programmes et les solutions techniques visant à améliorer la sécurité des sources radioactives.

 

c)    SÉCURITÉ DU TRANSPORT

 

À la suite d’un énoncé conjoint du SSN en 2014 sur la sécurité du transport des matières nucléaires et radiologiques, le Canada a participé aux « engagements complémentaires » du SSN sur la sécurité du transport et a contribué à des guides sur les bonnes pratiques de sécurité du transport pour les matières nucléaires civiles et d’autres produits radioactifs. Ces guides seront communiqués à d’autres pays lors du SSN de 2016, à l’aide de l’AIEA et de l’Initiative mondiale de lutte contre le terrorisme nucléaire (IMLTN), pour rendre compte des activités futures dans ce domaine.

 

De plus, le Canada a coparrainé la déclaration conjointe sur la sécurité maritime du SSN de 2014 et a participé à l’atelier du 16 au 19 novembre 2015 à Wilton Park qui a permis de formuler les recommandations visant à améliorer la sécurité de la chaîne d’approvisionnement maritime mondiale, plus particulièrement à l’aide de la dissuasion, de la détection et de l’intervention face à des matières nucléaires et à d’autres produits radioactifs en dehors du contrôle réglementaire. L’Agence des services frontaliers du Canada (ASFC) a effectué une présentation sur l’architecture de détection maritime du Canada et sur les expériences connexes.

 

Le PPM du Canada contribuera aux projets sur la sécurité du transport, y compris l’occasion de financer la mise à disposition de conteneurs dans le but de transporter et de consolider de façon sécuritaire les sources radioactives vers l’entreposage à long terme.

 

Le Canada continue d’appuyer les formations et les ateliers de l’AIEA et du WINS pour aider d’autres États à développer les compétences nécessaires en vue d’une politique de sécurité globale pour le transport des matières nucléaires et d’autres produits radioactifs.

 

d)    CAPACITÉS DE CRIMINALISTIQUE NUCLÉAIRE

 

Dans le cas où des matières nucléaires ou radioactives qui ne font pas l’objet d’un contrôle réglementaire sont interdites au Canada, il est essentiel que le gouvernement du Canada soit en mesure de connaître l’origine de ces matières, leur nature, et les risques qu’elles présentent pour contrer la menace de sécurité associée. La criminalistique nucléaire est donc un élément essentiel de l’intervention face au trafic illicite de matières nucléaires.

 

Conformément à son engagement lors du SSN de 2012 de promouvoir la création d’une capacité nationale de criminalistique nucléaire, le projet national sur la capacité d’analyse nucléolégale du Canada a été créé en mai 2013 pour appuyer la création d’un réseau national de laboratoires de criminalistique nucléaire et d’une bibliothèque nationale de criminalistique nucléaire. Le projet national sur la capacité d’analyse nucléolégale du Canada terminera ses activités de recherche et de création d’ici la fin mars 2016. La prochaine étape consistera à développer la capacité existante et à créer de manière formelle un réseau de laboratoires de criminalistique nucléaire ainsi qu’une bibliothèque nationale de criminalistique nucléaire. Le Centre des sciences pour la sécurité de Recherche et Développement pour la défense Canada et la CCSN dirigent ces efforts. La CCSN s’est engagée à maintenir et à faire fonctionner une bibliothèque nationale de criminalistique nucléaire au nom du gouvernement du Canada.

 

 

 

 

 

e)    INFORMATION ET CYBERSÉCURITÉ

 

En plus de protéger les renseignements nucléaires sensibles et classifiés sous toutes ses formes, le Canada est d’avis que la protection d’équipement et de systèmes essentiels est importante pour la sûreté nucléaire, la sécurité nucléaire et la préparation et l’intervention en cas d’urgence.

 

Le Canada a conçu une norme nationale (CSA N290.7) pour contrer les risques en matière de cybersécurité dans les centrales nucléaires et les installations dotées de petits réacteurs. Cette norme a été publiée en décembre 2014. Par ailleurs, les exploitants de centrales nucléaires au Canada disposent de programmes de cybersécurité conformes aux normes et aux pratiques exemplaires internationales.

 

Le Canada a accueilli une formation nationale de l’AIEA sur la sécurité informatique et la réalisation d’évaluations en décembre 2015 avec des participants de l’industrie, des organismes de réglementation et des pays partenaires. La formation comprenait une méthode pour la réalisation d’évaluations sur la sécurité informatique dans les installations nucléaires conformes aux normes internationales, l’orientation de l’AIEA et les pratiques exemplaires reconnues au sujet de la protection des renseignements et des systèmes de contrôle industriels. Le Canada dispose de procédures robustes dans le domaine, mais croit qu’il faut travailler davantage pour élever les normes à l’échelle internationale. Le Canada appuie les efforts de l’AIEA et du WINS visant à créer une telle orientation pour les ministères et les organismes gouvernementaux, les organismes de réglementation, les exploitants d’installations nucléaires et les instituts de recherche et d’enseignement à l’échelle nationale.

 

 

2.     CONTRIBUTION À LA RÉDUCTION AU MINIMUM DES MATIÈRES NUCLÉAIRES SENSIBLES

La réduction des stocks mondiaux d’uranium hautement enrichi (UHE) et de plutonium séparé contribuera à empêcher que les acteurs non étatiques fassent l’acquisition de telles matières, réduisant ainsi le risque de terrorisme nucléaire. Le Canada demeure engagé en faveur de la réduction des stocks d’UHE et a réalisé des progrès importants à l’échelle nationale et internationale.

 

Le Canada s’est engagé à mettre un terme à son utilisation d’uranium hautement enrichi dans la production d’isotopes médicaux. Le Canada a annoncé qu’il cessera la production régulière de molybdène 99 (Mo-99) du réacteur national de recherche universelle de Chalk River d’Énergie atomique du Canada limitée (EACL) en octobre 2016, et retirera cette installation en tant que fournisseur potentiel de dernier recours de la chaîne d’approvisionnement international de Mo-99 d’ici mars 2018, mettant ainsi fin à la production d’isotopes médicaux à base d’UHE au Canada. Le gouvernement poursuit son travail visant à assurer une chaîne d’approvisionnement fiable d’isotopes médicaux.

 

Lors du SSN de 2010, le Canada s’est engagé à rapatrier son carburant d’UHE d’origine américaine entreposé dans les Laboratoires de Chalk River et a accompli des progrès satisfaisants dans la mise en œuvre de cette initiative de rapatriement. Le Canada a rapatrié une cargaison de carburant d’UHE usé en 2010, une autre en 2012, puis quatre autres en 2015. La dernière et la plus importante phase de l’initiative de rapatriement pour le carburant d’UHE usé a commencé en août 2015, et devrait se terminer en mai 2019.

 

Après l’annonce de mars 2012 du Canada au sujet de l’élargissement de l’initiative de rapatriement de manière à inclure le renvoi de matières d’UHE supplémentaires entreposées dans les Laboratoires de Chalk River, une deuxième initiative a été lancée dans le but de rapatrier l’inventaire des liquides contenant de l’UHE d’EACL qui sont des sous-produits de la production d’isotopes médicaux. Les envois de liquides contenant de l’UHE devraient commencer au milieu de l’année 2016, et se terminer d’ici mai 2019.

 

De plus, l’Université de l’Alberta est en train de prendre des mesures afin d’arrêter son réacteur de recherche SLOWPOKE qui fonctionne au carburant d’UHE. L’Université de l’Alberta prévoit rapatrier le carburant d’UHE d’ici mai 2019. Une fois l’arrêt du réacteur de recherche de l’Université de l’Alberta effectuée, le Canada ne comptera plus qu’un seul réacteur de recherche au carburant d’UHE.

 

Le Canada a déterminé que les trois quarts de ses stocks de plutonium sont prêts à être éliminés, et il a entamé des discussions avec les États-Unis pour savoir s’ils accepteraient ces matières en vue d’une gestion à long terme. Le reste continuera d’être entreposé de manière sécuritaire et sera utilisé pour soutenir les travaux futurs de recherche et de développement.

 

À l’échelle internationale, le Canada a participé à un projet de conversion de réacteurs et d’enlèvement d’uranium dirigé par les États-Unis pour un réacteur de recherche SLOWPOKE au carburant d’UHE en Jamaïque, qui s’est terminé en octobre 2015.

 

3.     INTENSIFICATION DES EFFORTS DE LUTTE CONTRE LE TRAFIC ILLICITE DES MATIÈRES NUCLÉAIRES ET RADIOLOGIQUES

L’intensification des efforts et de la capacité de prévention, de détection et d’interdiction du trafic illicite de matières nucléaires et radiologiques est nécessaire pour réduire les risques que des acteurs non étatiques se procurent et utilisent ces matières comme armes nucléaires ou dispositifs de dispersion radiologiques. L’ASFC est en train de mettre à niveau le réseau de détection de radiations (RADNet) du Canada pour aider à prévenir le trafic illicite. RADNet analyse presque tous les conteneurs maritimes commerciaux qui entrent au Canada pour détecter la présence de radiations à l’aide de détecteurs indépendants de radiations sur portique automatisés aux principaux ports maritimes. L’ASFC travaille au remplacement de l’équipement vieillissant avec des moniteurs-portiques de détection de radiations avancés, qui permettent une sensibilité accrue et la caractérisation des sources pour améliorer la capacité du Canada à combattre le trafic illicite de matières radiologiques. Le Canada participe également à la diffusion d’information à l’échelle internationale sur le trafic illicite des matières nucléaires en apportant des contributions à la Base de données sur les incidents et les cas de trafic de l’AIEA et dans le cadre de coopérations bilatérales.

 

Le Canada continue à mettre en œuvre un programme axé sur le risque de la conformité à la sécurité relativement à l’autorisation de sources radioactives, et a mis en place des programmes exhaustifs de contrôle des importations et des exportations pour les sources radioactives des catégories 1 et 2.

 

Dans le cadre de l’engagement du Canada effectué lors du SSN de 2014 d’apporter 28 millions de dollars pour améliorer la sécurité nucléaire et radiologique, le PPM du Canada a accordé 15 millions de dollars pour renforcer les capacités des pays partenaires à détecter et interdire l’entrée de cargaisons illicites de matières nucléaires et radiologiques. Cet apport comprend l’octroi de 12,2 millions de dollars pour appuyer l’achat d’équipement embarqué et portatif de surveillance et de détection de radiations, et à l’installation de moniteurs-portiques aux principaux postes frontaliers en Jordanie. Le PPM du Canada a également apporté 2,3 millions de dollars pour appuyer les initiatives de lutte contre la contrebande de matières nucléaires au Pérou, et a contribué au financement de l’Organisation internationale de police criminelle (INTERPOL) pour la prestation de programmes de formation en Asie du Sud-Est et en Jordanie dans le but d’empêcher les activités de trafic illicite. Ce soutien a permis d’améliorer la sécurité aux passages frontaliers en Jordanie et d’atténuer les risques de trafic illicite de matières nucléaires et radiologiques dans la région.

 

À la suite du coparrainage du Canada des engagements complémentaires du SSN de 2014 pour la lutte contre la contrebande de matières nucléaires, le Canada a participé à un atelier dans les équipes de lutte contre la contrebande de matières nucléaires dans les régions vulnérables à Amman, Jordanie, en novembre 2015. Les participants ont partagé leurs expériences sur les défis que représente la réalisation d’enquêtes et d’opérations pour localiser et sécuriser les matières nucléaires ou radioactives faisant l’objet de trafic illicite. Le Canada a également participé à l’atelier de mars 2016 sur la lutte contre la contrebande de matières nucléaires qui a eu lieu à Karlsruhe, Allemagne, et organisé par les États-Unis et la Commission européenne. L’atelier d’une durée de trois jours a traité de la gestion de lieux de crime et de l’analyse en laboratoire des matières interdites, en visant à assurer que les enquêtes sur la contrebande de matières nucléaires entraînent des poursuites fructueuses.

 

4.     Appui aux instruments juridiques internationaux

a)    MODIFICATION DE LA CPPMN ET DE LA CIRATN

Le Canada est d’avis que la mise en œuvre universelle de la Convention internationale pour la répression des actes de terrorisme nucléaire (CIRATN) augmenterait de manière importante les efforts mondiaux existants de lutte antiterroriste. En conséquence, le Canada a adopté une loi en 2013, connue comme le projet de loi S-9 (la Loi sur le terrorisme nucléaire), qui a permis au Canada de ratifier l’Amendement à la Convention sur la protection physique
des matières nucléaires (A/CPPMN) et la CIRATN. Cette loi a modifié le Code criminel dans le but de créer un certain nombre de nouvelles infractions liées au terrorisme nucléaire, conformément à l’A/CPPMN et à la CIRATN.

 

Le Canada continue également de promouvoir un solide cadre de travail multilatéral axé sur la lutte mondiale contre le terrorisme nucléaire, en appuyant les efforts de l’AIEA à promouvoir l’entrée en vigueur de l’Amendement de 2005 à la Convention sur la protection physique des matières nucléaires (A/CPPMN) et en encourageant les États qui ne l’ont pas encore fait à ratifier l’A/CPPMN dès que possible.

 

À l’échelle internationale, le Canada a partagé son expérience sur l’élaboration et la conception de sa Loi sur le terrorisme nucléaire, en soulignant les obstacles et la façon dont ils ont été surmontés, dans le but d’aider d’autres États à faciliter leurs propres mesures législatives. Depuis octobre 2011, le PPG du Canada a octroyé 720 000 $ à six ateliers régionaux et a fourni une aide de suivi dans le but d’aider d’autres pays avec la mise en œuvre de l’A/CPPMN et de la CIRATN par l’identification des obstacles à la ratification et en les surmontant. Ces ateliers ont permis la ratification de l’A/CPPMN par huit pays.

 

b)    RÉSOLUTION 1540 DU CONSEIL DE SÉCURITÉ DES NATIONS UNIES

Le Canada appuie la mise en œuvre intégrale et universelle de la Résolution 1540 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies (RCSNU) en tant qu’outil essentiel dans la lutte mondiale contre la prolifération et le terrorisme lié aux armes de destruction massive (ADM). La Résolution impose plusieurs obligations contraignantes pour les États visant à établir et à maintenir des contrôles nationaux dans le but de renforcer la sécurité de matières nucléaires, en harmonie avec les objectifs du SSN.

 

Lors du SSN de 2014, le Canada et la République de Corée ont accueilli l’appui de 32 pays et de l’ONU pour l’énoncé conjoint sur la mise en œuvre intégrale et universelle de la RCSNU 1540. Cet énoncé conjoint a encouragé les États participants à aider d’autres États à mettre en œuvre les dispositions en matière de sécurité nucléaire de la RCSNU 1540 et pour faire avancer les priorités du Comité 1540. Le Canada a également fait circuler l’énoncé conjoint lors de la séance spéciale du CSNU du 7 mai 2007 sur le 10e anniversaire de la RCSNU 1540, ou le texte a été présenté au CSNU aux fins d’inclusion dans le compte rendu du débat. Au cours du SSN de 2016, le Canada a collaboré avec l’Espagne et la République de Corée pour renouveler l’énoncé conjoint de 2014 sur la RCSNU 1540 avec un énoncé conjoint de 2016 décrivant les mesures supplémentaires volontaires à prendre par les États, comme la défense d’une meilleure coordination et coopération entre le Comité 1540 et les organisations et institutions internationales de sécurité nucléaire.

 

Le PPM du Canada travaille en étroite collaboration avec le Comité 1540 pour trouver des moyens de répondre aux besoins non satisfaits en vue de la mise en œuvre de la RCSNU 1540, y compris un rôle de coordination pour le Comité 1540. À cette fin, le Canada applaudit la participation régulière des experts du Comité 1540 lors des récentes réunions du Groupe de travail du Partenariat mondial, et appuie fortement les efforts en cours du Comité 1540 visant à atteindre la mise en œuvre universelle de la RCSNU 1540.

 

L’équipe des programmes réalisés au titre de la RCSNU 1540 du PPM du Canada œuvre à la réduction de la menace posée par l’acquisition d’ADM et de matières connexes par des terroristes en rehaussant la capacité des États d’empêcher la prolifération des armes chimiques, biologiques, radiologiques et nucléaires (CBRN) et de leurs vecteurs, et de mettre en place des contrôles nationaux pour les matières connexes dans le but de prévenir leur trafic illicite. Les trois principaux piliers de l’équipe des programmes réalisés au titre de la RCSNU 1540 du PPM sont les suivants : 1) fournir des formations et de l’équipement liés aux armes CBRN; 2) fournir une assistance législative et réglementaire pour les traités liés aux armes CBRN; 3) renforcer les contrôles à l’exportation et la sécurité frontalière. Cette équipe des programmes du PPM collabore également avec le Comité de la RCSNU 1540 pour répondre aux demandes d’assistance des États membres de l’ONU.

 

À l’échelle nationale, le Canada a présenté au Comité de la RCSNU 1540 un Plan d’action national de mise en œuvre à la suite de son engagement fait lors du SSN de 2014. Ce plan décrit les plans et les priorités à l’échelle nationale et internationale pour la mise en œuvre des dispositions de la RCSNU 1540, ce qui renforcera la capacité du Canada d’éviter la prolifération d’ADM et le terrorisme.

 

5.     CONTRIBUTION AUX SERVICES ET AUX ACTIVITÉS LIÉES À LA SÉCURITÉ NUCLÉAIRE DE L’AIEA ET UTILISATION DE CES SERVICES ET ACTIVITÉS

À l’heure actuelle, le Canada est le troisième bailleur de fonds national en importance pour le Fonds de sécurité nucléaire de l’AIEA, grâce à une contribution de plus de 20,6 millions de dollars dans le cadre du PPM depuis 2004. Les résultats comprennent l’amélioration physique de la sécurité radiologique et des installations connexes; le recouvrement des sources radiologiques et la gestion en fin de vie; le renforcement de la sécurité physique et la séquestration des matières utilisables dans les armes nucléaires aux sites nucléaires; et le renforcement des capacités des États membres à gérer les menaces nucléaires et radiologiques et à y répondre. Le Canada contribue de manière active à la Collection Sécurité nucléaire de l’AIEA. Il a récemment participé au comité d’orientation sur la sécurité nucléaire et il a contribué à l’élaboration de documents pour la Collection Sécurité nucléaire. Le Canada a également soutenu la révision de l’orientation internationale sur les mesures prises contre la menace interne, a facilité la création du matériel de formation connexe et a prodigué une formation internationale.

 

En 2014, le Canada a participé à la Conférence internationale sur les avancées en criminalistique nucléaire, et a apporté son soutien sur le plan de l’organisation. En juin 2015, le Canada a participé à la Conférence internationale sur la sécurité informatique dans un monde nucléaire : discussions et échanges entre les experts. Le Canada a dirigé une démonstration sur la sécurité informatique, a présidé une séance principale et deux séances techniques, et a présenté six documents. Le Canada accueille la Conférence internationale sur la sécurité nucléaire de 2016, qui aura lieu en décembre 2016, et participera de manière active à la Conférence en appuyant un engagement renouvelé par les États membres de l’AIEA pour relever le défi de la sécurité nucléaire à la lumière des nouvelles menaces et des nouveaux défis.

 

a)    Mission du SCIPP

 

Suite à son engagement effectué lors du SSN de 2014 à La Haye, le Canada a accueilli sa première mission du Service consultatif international sur la protection physique (SCIPP) de l’AIEA du 19 au 30 octobre 2015. À la demande du Canada, la mission du SCIPP a examiné les cinq modules du SCIPP, notamment le cadre législatif et réglementaire lié à la sécurité du Canada pour les matières et les installations nucléaires, les arrangements en matière de sécurité appliqués au transport des matières nucléaires, la sécurité des matières radioactives et les installations et activités connexes, et les systèmes d’information et de sécurité informatique en place. L’équipe a visité plusieurs installations, y compris les réacteurs de puissance et les réacteurs de recherche, pour examiner les systèmes de protection physique.

 

Le rapport final de la mission du SCIPP présente un survol global du cadre de sécurité nucléaire du Canada, qui est considéré comme solide, résilient et durable. Le Canada accorde de l’importance au rapport et aux conclusions de la mission du SCIPP, notant en particulier l’occasion de parfaire son cadre de sécurité nucléaire et de partager ses pratiques exemplaires. Le Canada demeure un ardent défenseur de la divulgation volontaire d’information des missions du SCIPP afin d’être mieux à même de constituer un répertoire mondial de pratiques exemplaires et d’enseignements tirés, et publiera un résumé accessible au public du rapport de la mission du SCIPP. Le Canada reconnaît l’importance de la création et de la mise en œuvre de documents d’orientation sur la sécurité nucléaire de l’AIEA et appuie l’amélioration continuelle de la protection physique et de la sécurité nucléaire à l’échelle nationale et internationale. À cette fin, le Canada a aidé l’AIEA dans la conduite des missions du SCIPS dans d’autres pays, dont le Royaume-Uni, l’Indonésie, la Hongrie, la Roumanie, les États-Unis et l’Australie.

 

b)    CENTRE DE SOUTIEN EN SÉCURITÉ NUCLÉAIRE

Les centres de soutien en sécurité nucléaire peuvent permettre d’assurer une sécurité nucléaire durable et efficace en facilitant la création des connaissances, de l’expertise et des compétences nécessaires pour le personnel responsable de la sécurité nucléaire. Ainsi, le Canada continue d’appuyer l’AIEA dans ses efforts visant à établir des centres de soutien en sécurité nucléaire et a offert une présentation lors de la réunion d’août 2015 du groupe de travail sur le cadre de réglementation canadien, ainsi que la formation du personnel dans les installations nucléaires.

 

La CCSN poursuit l’étude de la mise en place d’un centre de soutien en sécurité nucléaire pour permettre d’assurer une sécurité nucléaire durable et efficace. En mai 2015, un atelier sur le respect des engagements canadiens en matière de compétences démontrables dans la réglementation et la mise en œuvre de la sécurité nucléaire a eu lieu avec la participation des intervenants canadiens en sécurité nucléaire et du WINS en vue d’établir un cadre de compétence commun et un programme de perfectionnement professionnel pour les organismes de réglementation et les titulaires de permis.

 

6.     SOUTIEN DES ACTIVITÉS INTERNATIONALES LIÉES À LA SÉCURITÉ NUCLÉAIRE

Le Canada participe à l’ensemble des principales activités internationales liées à la sécurité nucléaire, notamment au G-7 Groupe sur la sûreté et la sécurité nucléaires (G-7 GSSN), à l’IMLTN, à l’Initiative de sécurité contre la prolifération (ISP), à INTERPOL et au Partenariat mondial contre la prolifération des armes de destruction massive et des matières connexes (PM), et travaille avec le Comité de la RCSNU 1540 et son groupe d’experts.

 

a)    PARTENARIAT MONDIAL CONTRE LA PROLIFÉRATION DES ARMES DE DESTRUCTION MASSIVE ET DES MATIÈRES CONNEXES

 

Reconnaissant la gravité de la menace posée par l’acquisition terroriste d’armes de destruction massive (ADM) et de matières connexes, le G8 a lancé le PM sous la direction du Canada lors du Sommet de 2002 tenu à Kananaskis. Le Canada participe activement au PM et copréside le Groupe de travail du Partenariat mondial sur l’expansion et le rayonnement.

 

Le PPM du Canada appuie le PM avec des projets visant à empêcher la prolifération des ADM et à réduire la menace posée par le terrorisme CBRN. Le PPM met en place des projets à l’échelle internationale dans les domaines de priorités, notamment la sécurité nucléaire et radiologique, la sécurité biologique, le soutien à la mise en œuvre de la RSCNU 1540 et la destruction des armes chimiques.

 

À ce jour, le PPM du Canada a contribué à plus de 1,2 milliard de dollars dans les programmes de réduction de la menace posée par les ADM. Lors du SSN de 2014, le Canada s’est engagé à accorder 28 millions de dollars pour améliorer les programmes de sécurité nucléaire, engagement qui a été respecté et qui a permis l’amélioration de la sécurité physique dans les installations nucléaires, en mettant l’accent sur l’Asie du Sud-Est, sur l’atténuation du trafic illicite de matières nucléaires et radiologiques au Moyen-Orient, et sur l’amélioration de la sécurité des sources radioactives en Amérique latine.

 

Dans le cadre du SSN de 2016, le Canada est heureux d’annoncer qu’il apportera 42 millions de dollars pour des projets additionnels visant à améliorer la sécurité nucléaire et radiologique, et pour maintenir l’élan au-delà du processus du SNN.

 

b)    INITIATIVE DE LUTTE MONDIALE CONTRE LE TERRORISME NUCLÉAIRE

 

Le Canada s’est engagé à atteindre l’objectif de l’IMLTN de renforcer la capacité mondiale à éviter et à détecter le terrorisme nucléaire, et à y répondre. Le Canada participe de manière active aux événements et aux exercices de l’IMLTN, notamment aux réunions du Groupe d’application et d’évaluation et aux réunions plénières biennales de l’IMLTN. Le Canada continue de diriger le développement de progrès techniques dans le domaine de la criminalistique nucléaire, et travaille en étroite collaboration avec le Groupe de travail sur la criminalistique nucléaire de l’IMLTN. Par exemple, le Canada a joué un rôle important dans l’élaboration et la prestation d’exercices techniques, y compris « Mystic Deer » à Budapest en octobre 2014 et « Glowing Tulip » à La Haye en mars 2015. L’exercice « Glowing Tulip » a permis de démontrer l’utilité de dispositions juridiques solides pour la criminalisation des matières qui ne font pas l’objet d’un contrôle réglementaire, a souligné les pratiques exemplaires pour la gestion en laboratoire de preuves criminalistiques, et a offert aux pays partenaires des outils et des renseignements visant à accroître la capacité de leurs laboratoires nationaux à fournir des témoignages d’experts dans un tribunal.

 

Le Canada a également appuyé des événements pluridisciplinaires, dont l’événement « Radiant City » tenu à Karlsruhe, Allemagne, en mai 2015, qui a examiné l’interaction entre les domaines de la détection et de la criminalistique nucléaires. Le Canada continuera d’appuyer l’IMLTN en offrant une expertise technique additionnelle dans le cadre des activités de l’IMLTN, notamment les travaux de criminalistique nucléaire et de détection nucléaire ainsi que d’autres travaux techniques liés à la sécurité nucléaire des groupes de travail de l’IMLTN.

 

c)    INITIATIVE DE SÉCURITÉ CONTRE LA PROLIFÉRATION

 

Le Canada continue de collaborer avec d’autres partenaires de l’Initiative de sécurité contre la prolifération (ISP) dans le but de renforcer les capacités collectives d’empêcher l’exportation illicite d’armes nucléaires et radiologiques et de matières connexes par voie maritime, terrestre ou aérienne. Cette collaboration est accomplie grâce à des exercices de renforcement des capacités, à l’échange d’information et de pratiques exemplaires et à la participation à des exercices pratiques. En septembre 2014, le Canada a financé un séminaire régional de l’ISP dans les Caraïbes en juin 2014 qui a réuni des partenaires de la CARICOM dans le but d’encourager leur participation à l’ISP et de renforcer les capacités et la coopération dans la région en matière d’interdiction des ADM. Le Canada a également accueilli la réunion du Groupe d’experts opérationnels de l’ISP à Ottawa en mai 2015, qui a permis de concentrer les efforts de l’ISP sur les nouveaux défis liés à la prolifération, notamment le financement de la prolifération et le transfert technologique intangible. À l’échelle nationale, le Canada continuera à communiquer les leçons tirées à l’échelle nationale à ses partenaires et à fournir des documents au répertoire d’outils et de ressources de l’Initiative sur les capacités et les pratiques essentielles (ICPE).

 

7.     Partenariat avec des intervenants externes

a)    COOPÉRATION ENTRE LE GOUVERNEMENT ET L’INDUSTRIE NUCLÉAIRE

Compte tenu de l’important rôle joué par le secteur nucléaire dans le respect des normes en matière de sécurité nucléaire, le Canada continue de mettre l’accent sur une forte coopération entre l’industrie et le gouvernement. Cela permet d’assurer à la fois pertinence et transparence dans la création de systèmes de conformité nationaux pour la sûreté nucléaire et la sécurité nucléaire. Les efforts en cours visant à éliminer l’utilisation de la production d’isotopes médicaux à base d’UHE au Canada sont un exemple de l’étroite collaboration entre le gouvernement et l’industrie.

 

Le gouvernement du Canada a investi environ 60 millions de dollars pour appuyer la recherche et la création de méthodes alternatives aux technologies à base d’UHE dans la production de technologies d’isotopes médicaux, en plus d’encourager leur utilisation par l’industrie. Les investissements spécifiques dans les technologies alternatives de production qui n’utilisent pas d’UHE et qui réduisent les déchets radioactifs dans le cadre de la production d’isotopes comprennent le Programme de contribution financière à la production d’isotopes (2010-2012) et le Programme d’accélération des technologies des isotopes (2012-2016) par Ressources naturelles Canada. Des efforts supplémentaires ont été déployés pour la création de cyclotrons et d’accélérateurs linéaires aux fins d’utilisation dans la production de l’isotope médical technetium-99m. Les partenaires dans ces programmes ont adapté les infrastructures et l’équipement, et procèdent actuellement aux essais cliniques nécessaires aux fins d’obtention d’un permis. Ces efforts coopératifs visent à réduire l’utilisation d’UHE et à atteindre un approvisionnement d’isotopes plus diversifié et plus sécuritaire.

 

De plus, le Canada participe à cinq régimes multilatéraux de contrôle à l’exportation qui ont pour but d’éviter l’exportation de marchandises ou de technologies pouvant être utilisées dans des programmes ou des vecteurs d’ADM : le Groupe des fournisseurs nucléaires (GFN) et le Comité Zangger, le Groupe d’Australie, le Régime de contrôle de la technologie relative aux missiles (RCTM) et l’Accord de Wassenaar. En vertu de ces accords, le Canada a mis en place des mesures pour contrôler l’exportation de biens et de technologies afin d’empêcher leur utilisation dans le cadre de programmes d’ADM ou de systèmes de livraison d’ADM, et a fourni des informations aux exportateurs sur la mise en œuvre des exigences contenues dans la Loi sur les licences d’exportation et d’importation et dans la Loi sur la sûreté et la réglementation nucléaires, qui enchâssent dans la loi canadienne les engagements politiques pris par le Canada dans le cadre des cinq régimes susmentionnés

 

b)    Partenariat avec les ONG

Le Canada était un des donateurs fondateurs du WINS, un chef de file en perfectionnement professionnel et en certification pour la gestion de la sécurité nucléaire, et continue de fournir du soutien financier et technique. Suite à un engagement effectué lors du SSN de 2014, le PPM du Canada a participé au financement d’un projet avec le WINS visant à créer un cadre de compétences pour le personnel et la direction ayant des responsabilités dans la sécurité nucléaire. Un guide sur les pratiques exemplaires connexes a été publié en 2015. Dans le contexte du SSN de 2016, le Canada a collaboré avec le Royaume-Uni et d’autres contributeurs de l’Académie du WINS pour émettre des engagements complémentaires qui encouragent l’expansion du programme de certification internationale du WINS, et qui exhortent les États participants du SSN à contribuer au développement continu de l’Académie.